2015 · GS Paper 2 · Q4 · 12 marks

Khap Panchayats have been in the news for functioning as extra-constitutional authorities, often delivering pronouncements amounting to human rights violations. Discuss critically, the actions taken by the legislative, executive and the judiciary to set the things right in this regard.

In short

The judiciary has done most to curb khap panchayats, declaring their marriage diktats illegal and adult choice a fundamental right, while the legislature and executive have lagged. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (2018) laid down preventive, remedial and punitive directions, but no central law yet exists.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction

Khap panchayats, extra-legal caste councils, have issued diktats against same-gotra and inter-caste marriages, ending in boycotts and honour killings such as the Manoj-Babli murders (2007), in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21.

Actions by the Three Organs

1. Legislature: The Law Commission's 242nd Report (2012) drafted a bill against interference in marriages, which Parliament never enacted, though the Rajasthan Assembly passed such a bill in 2019. 2. Executive: States have offered safe houses and police protection to couples, and the NHRC and NCW have intervened, mostly after crimes occurred. 3. Judiciary: Lata Singh (2006) upheld the right to marry by choice, Arumugam Servai (2011) declared khap diktats illegal, and Shafin Jahan (2018) placed choice of partner under Article 21.

How Far the Actions Have Worked

Shakti Vahini (2018) Shield → Mark sensitive districts → Stop khap assemblies → Safe houses for couples → FIR and special cell → Fast-track trial

1. Strongest step: Shakti Vahini (2018) made khap assemblies condemning lawful marriages illegal and made officers liable for negligence. 2. Gaps: There is still no distinct offence of honour killing in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and political patronage and police reluctance keep compliance patchy. 3. Reform from within: The Bibipur khap mahapanchayat against female foeticide (2012) shows the councils can be harnessed.

Way Forward
•

Central law and audit

Enact the Law Commission's draft and make district compliance with Shakti Vahini answerable to High Courts.

Conclusion
The judiciary has established that adult choice in marriage is a fundamental right, but a dedicated statute and firm executive enforcement are needed to restore the rule of law and dignity to every couple.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Shakti Vahini (2018) Shield. Shakti Vahini (2018) Shield. Flow: Mark sensitive districts → Stop khap assemblies → Safe houses for couples → FIR and special cell → Fast-track trial
Diagram: Shakti Vahini (2018) Shield

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Dispute Redressal Mechanisms & Institutions1 question

Asked in 1 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
1
2016
–
2017
–
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
–
2026
–

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2015 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·