2015 · GS Paper 4 · Q9 · 20 marks

A private company is known for its efficiency, transparency and employee welfare. The company though owned by a private individual has a cooperative character where employees feel a sense of ownership. The company employs nearly 700 personnel and they have voluntarily decided not to form a union. One day suddenly in the morning, about 40 men belonging to a political party gate-crashed into the factory demanding jobs in the factory. They threatened the management and employees, and also used foul language. The employees feel demoralized. It was clear that those people who gate-crashed wanted to be on the payroll of the company as well as continue as the volunteers/members of the party. The company maintains high standards of integrity and does not oblige the civil administration, including law enforcement agencies. Such incidents occur in the public sector also. (a) Assuming that you are the CEO of the company, what would you do to defuse the volatile situation on the day of the gate-crashing and dharna inside the company premises by the unruly crowd? (b) What could be the long-term solution to the issue involved in the case? (c) Every solution/action, that you would suggest, is likely to have positive and negative impact on you (as CEO), on the employees and on the performance of the employees. Analyse the consequences of each of the actions suggested by you.

In short

The CEO should keep employees safe, talk calmly to the crowd's representatives, refuse jobs under duress and seek police help on record. Long-term, transparent hiring, local skilling through CSR and a Works Committee under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 remove the pretext for such pressure.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The case pits Workplace Peace, the safety of 700 employees, against Merit-based Fairness, jobs earned rather than extorted.
(a) Defusing the Situation on the Day
•

Safety first

Move employees away from the crowd and avoid confrontation, keeping my own emotions in check.

•

Talk, do not concede

Meet a few representatives, hear them, and explain that jobs follow a merit-based process.

•

Lawful help

Inform the police in writing about trespass and intimidation, preserve CCTV evidence, and ask the party's district leadership to disown the act.

(b) Long-term Solution
•

Transparent hiring

Publish vacancies, criteria and results so pressure has no pretext.

•

Skill the locals

Train local youth through ITIs and CSR under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.

•

Structured voice

A Works Committee under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 gives employees a formal forum without a union, keeping their cooperative spirit.

(c) Consequences of Each Action
•

Dialogue

Reassures employees and shows a composed CEO, though the crowd may see weakness.

•

Police complaint

Upholds the rule of law but may invite political hostility towards the CEO.

•

No jobs under duress

Preserves merit and productivity, at the risk of repeated protests.

•

Hiring and skilling reforms

Build long-term legitimacy, but cost time and money.

Justification:
Aristotle's Phronesis: the mean between surrender and confrontation is calm, firm, lawful engagement.
Conclusion
I would protect my people, refuse to buy peace with jobs, and build institutions that make such pressure futile, keeping both morale and integrity intact.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Workplace Peace vs Merit-based Fairness. Workplace Peace vs Merit-based Fairness. Venn diagram: Workplace Peace, Merit-based Fairness; overlap: Dialogue without concession
Diagram: Workplace Peace vs Merit-based Fairness

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Corporate Conduct8 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
1
2015
2
2016
1
2017
–
2018
–
2019
–
2020
1
2021
1
2022
1
2023
–
2024
1
2025
–
2026
–

All 8 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2015 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·