"Terrorism is emerging as a competitive industry over the last few decades." Analyze the above statement.

Question

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Terrorism has largely become a competitive industry where rival groups outbid each other for recruits, funds and attention, though ideology and state sponsorship keep it from being a pure market. After ISIS declared its caliphate in 2014, al-Qaeda launched its Indian Subcontinent branch that year.

**Introduction**

David Rapoport's religious wave of terrorism, which began in 1979, increasingly behaves like a market. Rival groups compete for the same recruits, donors, territory and headlines, and borrow the tools of business to win.

**How Terrorism Behaves Like a Competitive Industry**

SKETCH: flow-cycle | The Terror Outbidding Cycle
- Spectacular attack
- Media share
- Recruits and funds
- Bigger capability

1. **Outbidding**: Mia Bloom's outbidding thesis explains why rivals escalate brutality to stand out; after ISIS declared its caliphate in 2014, al-Qaeda launched al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent the same year to keep South Asian recruits.
2. **Franchising**: ISIS licensed its brand to Boko Haram and the Islamic State Khorasan Province in 2015, as a corporation grows through franchises.
3. **Diversified revenue**: Oil smuggling, extortion and narcotics fund groups, and Tamara Makarenko's crime-terror continuum fits India: D-Company's smuggling routes carried the RDX for the 1993 Bombay blasts.
4. **Rebranding**: Lashkar-e-Taiba's Kashmir front became The Resistance Front, designated a terrorist organisation by the US in 2025 after the Pahalgam attack.

**Where the Industry Analogy Falls Short**

1. **Ideology over profit**: Jaish-e-Mohammed is driven by ideology and grievance, and a suicide attacker seeks no material return.
2. **State patrons**: Pakistan's ISI sustains Lashkar and Jaish as proxies, and FATF grey-listed Pakistan over terror-financing lapses from 2018 to 2022.
3. **Collusion and collapse**: The Taliban and al-Qaeda cooperate rather than compete, and over-reach cost ISIS its last territory at Baghuz in 2019.

**Conclusion**

The statement largely holds: competition for recruits, money and attention explains terror's rising spectacle and spread, though ideology and state sponsorship keep it from being a pure market. Making terror unprofitable, by choking finance and contesting its narrative, is the path to comprehensive national security.

"Terrorism is emerging as a competitive industry over the last few decades." Analyze the above statement.

Model answer

Practise this question

Extremism17 questions

Ghissu