You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant workers. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region. But in practice, most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became very hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity and uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them to close their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. (a) What are the options available to you under the given situation? (b) Critically examine the options listed by you. (c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option?

Model answer

Paper viewText view

2 pages3 pagesDetailedPDF

Exam length · 281wShort · 175wFull · 509w

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026 · 281 words

Q1.

You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant workers. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region. But in practice, most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became very hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity and uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them to close their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. (a) What are the options available to you under the given situation? (b) Critically examine the options listed by you. (c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option?20

Introduction

This case turns on whether a regulator can enforce environmental law without pushing migrant workers into destitution.

(a) Options Available to Me

I can withdraw the notices, close every violator, refer upward and wait, quietly extend deadlines, or enforce graded, time-bound compliance.

(b) Critical Examination of the Options

•

(i) CAPITULATE [Compromised-Hybrid]

Withdrawing notices keeps jobs but is Moral Myopia towards sick residents.

•

(ii) CONFRONT [Strict-Legal]

Closing all units upholds law but makes workers pay for owners' faults.

•

(iii) EVADE [Procedural-Evasive]

Referring upward is Moral Escapism and Diffusion of Responsibility.

•

(iv) COMPROMISE [Empathetic-Humanitarian]

Quiet extensions breed Dual-Standard Practice and Regulatory Capture.

•

(v) RECONCILE ✓ [Balanced]

Close the gravest violators, give others a published deadline with help (recommended).

(c) Mechanism to Ensure Environmental Compliance

•

Real-time monitoring

Publish data from the CPCB's continuous emission monitoring system (2014) [scheme] and inspect red-category units most often.

•

Polluter pays

Levy compensation per Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum (1996) [case], and build common effluent plants for small units and market tools like Surat's emissions trading (2019) [current event].

(d) Ethical Dilemmas in Exercising My Option

Environment vs Livelihood. Venn diagram: Healthy Environment, Livelihood Security; overlap: Graded, time-bound compliance

•

Core dilemma

The core dilemma is between the Right to a Healthy Environment (Subhash Kumar, 1991) and the Right to Livelihood (Olga Tellis, 1985), with Professional Duty vs Personal Safety alongside.

•

Issues

Threats, political pressure and paper compliance are issues to handle firmly, not dilemmas.

Justification:

Aristotle's Phronesis: graded enforcement finds the mean between ruinous closure and lawless tolerance.

Conclusion

Graded, transparent enforcement protects villagers' health and workers' jobs together, and steadiness under threats keeps the board credible.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2022 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.