2016 · Paper IV · 10 marksFrequently asked

The proportion of revenue receipts and total budgetary receipts as percentage of GSDP increased during the period 2002-2007 and declined during 2008-14. Explain the factors contributed for such trend.

In short

Receipts rose as a share of GSDP in 2002-2007 as growth near 8%, a wider service tax base, Twelfth Finance Commission grants and Andhra Pradesh's Hyderabad boom and 2005 VAT lifted revenue. They fell in 2008-14 with the global financial crisis, rising committed spending and the 2009-14 statehood agitation.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The rise in revenue and budgetary receipts as a percentage of GSDP during 2002-2007 reflected strong economic growth and fiscal reforms, while the decline during 2008-2014 was due to global shocks and fiscal pressures, notably in states like Andhra Pradesh321.
Factors Behind the Increase (2002-2007)
•

Strong Economic Growth and Tax Expansion

GDP growth averaged 8%, boosting tax revenues; service tax rate increased from 5% to 12%, coverage expanded from 52 to 98 services, raising receipts.

•

Fiscal Reforms and Grants

Twelfth Finance Commission enhanced non-plan grants; improved tax administration increased buoyancy; undivided Andhra Pradesh’s Hyderabad-led boom and the 2005 switch to VAT expanded its tax base.

Reasons for the Decline (2008-2014)
•

Global Financial Crisis and Fiscal Deficits

The 2008 slowdown reduced tax collections; rising pensions and interest payments crowded out capital expenditure; in Andhra Pradesh the 2009-14 statehood agitation disrupted economic activity.

•

Slower Tax Buoyancy and Disinvestment

Corporate tax growth slowed amid uncertainty; disinvestment and loan recoveries slowed, lowering non-debt capital receipts.

Economic and Fiscal Influences
•

Growth-Deficit Dynamics and Debt Sustainability

Growth outpaced borrowing costs in 2002-07, improving fiscal health; this gap narrowed in 2008-14, increasing fiscal stress.

•

Revenue Deficit Impact

Persistent deficits limited capital expenditure, affecting future revenue potential.

Conclusion
The contrasting trends in revenue receipts4 as a percentage of GSDP were shaped by economic growth, tax policy, fiscal reforms, and external shocks, with states like Andhra Pradesh exemplifying these dynamics.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Why receipts rose, then fell. Why receipts rose, then fell. Comparison of 2002-07 rise and 2008-14 decline
Diagram: Why receipts rose, then fell

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Resource mobilization in Andhra Pradesh20 questions

Asked in 8 of 8 sittings since 2008

2008
4
2011
3
2012
3
2016
1
2017
4
2020
2
2023
2
2025
1

Most tested: Andhra Pradesh’s revenue sources, central transfers, and resource allocation/resource gap after bifurcation.

All 20 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official APPSC Group-I Mains 2016 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·