Examine the scope of 'reasonable restrictions' and the 'test of reasonableness' in connection with Article…

Question

Examine the scope of 'reasonable restrictions' and the 'test of reasonableness' in connection with Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Article 19(2) to (6) allows only law to impose reasonable restrictions on the six freedoms for grounds like security, public order and morality, and courts test reasonableness through proportionality, proximate nexus and procedural fairness. In Shreya Singhal (2015), the Supreme Court struck down vague Section 66A.

**Introduction**

The scope of 'reasonable restrictions' under Article 19 involves balancing fundamental freedoms with public interest, shaped by judicial interpretations like Shreya Singhal v. UOI (2015), which stressed proportionality and clarity in restrictions.

**Scope of 'Reasonable Restrictions' under Article 19**

1. **Constitutional Grounds for Restrictions**: Articles 19(2) to (6) authorize restrictions on freedoms such as speech and assembly for sovereignty, security, public order, morality, and foreign relations; for instance, restrictions on speech prevent defamation or incitement.

2. **Legislative Authority and Limits**: Restrictions must be imposed by law and be reasonable, not arbitrary or excessive, as held in Chintaman Rao v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1950), ensuring a balance between individual rights and social control.

**Judicial Analysis of the 'Test of Reasonableness'**

1. **Proportionality and Nexus Test**: The Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal emphasized that restrictions must have a proximate nexus to the public interest, rejecting vague or broad laws like Section 66A of the IT Act.

2. **Substantive and Procedural Reasonableness**: Courts review both substance and procedure, as in Dr. N.B. Khare v. State of Delhi (1950), ensuring fairness in the duration and implementation of restrictions.

**Constitutional and Judicial Framework Governing Restrictions**

1. **Judicial Review as Safeguard**: The judiciary acts as a guardian of fundamental rights⟦1⟧ by scrutinizing restrictions to prevent arbitrary state action.

2. **Integration with Article 21**: The right to privacy under Article 21, recognized in the Puttaswamy judgment, also permits reasonable restrictions, complementing Article 19 protections.

**Conclusion**

The constitutional and judicial framework ensures that reasonable restrictions under Article 19 are proportionate, legally grounded, and protective of fundamental rights.

Model answer

ఈ ప్రశ్నను ప్రాక్టీస్ చేయండి

భారత రాజ్యాంగం, ప్రాథమిక హక్కులు, DPSP మరియు కేంద్ర-రాష్ట్ర విధులు18 questions

Ghissu