2013 · GS Paper 2 · Q20 · 10 marks

Economic ties between India and Japan while growing in the recent years are still far below their potential. Elucidate the policy constraints which are inhibiting this growth.

In short

India-Japan economic ties lag their potential because of Indian policy frictions, such as retrospective tax, land and labour hurdles and weak infrastructure, and Japanese ones, such as non-tariff barriers and nuclear and arms export curbs. Bilateral trade stayed below US$ 20 billion in 2012-13 despite the 2011 CEPA.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Despite CEPA (2011) and Japan's role as India's largest bilateral aid donor, bilateral trade stayed below US$ 20 billion in 2012-13, a sliver of Japan-China trade. Complementarity is high; policy frictions on both sides hold growth back.
Constraints Rooted in India's Policy Climate
•

Regulatory Unpredictability

The 2012 retrospective tax amendment after the Vodafone ruling signalled that settled positions could be reopened, which alarmed risk-averse Japanese investors.

•

Land and Labour

Land acquisition delays slowed the Japan-backed Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, and the 2012 Manesar plant violence at Maruti Suzuki raised labour concerns.

•

Infrastructure Gaps

Power shortages, poor freight logistics and port delays raise costs for the just-in-time supply chains Japanese manufacturers run.

•

Sectoral FDI Caps

26% ceilings on foreign stakes in insurance and defence in 2013 denied Japanese firms the control they sought.

Constraints on the Japanese Side and in CEPA
•

Non-tariff Barriers

Japan's strict drug approval and food safety standards blunted CEPA's tariff cuts for Indian generics and farm goods, keeping Indian exports narrow and petroleum-heavy.

•

Nuclear and Defence Curbs

Without a civil nuclear deal in 2013 and with India outside the NPT, Japanese reactor suppliers stayed out, while arms export curbs stalled the US-2 aircraft talks.

Conclusion
Stable tax rules, land and labour reform, a nuclear pact and CEPA review of non-tariff barriers can unlock the tie and turn complementarity into trade. The 2016 nuclear agreement and over 100 Japanese capability centres in India by 2026 (Deloitte) show what follows when the constraints ease.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Why Trade Stays Below Potential. Why Trade Stays Below Potential. Diagram (fishbone): Why Trade Stays Below Potential; Below-potential ties; Retrospective tax; Land and labour; Weak logistics; Japanese drug rules; No nuclear deal; Arms export ban
Diagram: Why Trade Stays Below Potential

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Bilateral7 questions

Asked in 6 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
–
2015
1
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
2
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
1
2026
–

All 7 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2013 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·