2013 · GS Paper 3 · Q1 · 10 marks

With a consideration towards the strategy of inclusive growth, the new Companies Bill, 2013 has indirectly made CSR a mandatory obligation. Discuss the challenges expected in its implementation in right earnest. Also discuss other provisions in the Bill and their implications.

In short

Mandatory CSR under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 faces a weak comply-or-explain start, skewed geography, scarce implementing capacity and an outlay-over-outcome culture. The Act's other provisions, independent and women directors, auditor rotation, class action suits and the NCLT, strengthen corporate governance after Satyam.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Companies Act, 2013, shaped by the lessons of the Satyam fraud, made India the first country to write a CSR duty into company law: under Section 135, large companies must spend 2% of their average net profit of three years on Schedule VII activities, linking corporate growth to inclusive growth.
Challenges in Implementing Mandatory CSR
•

Comply-or-explain loophole

Firms could simply explain non-spending until the 2019 amendment forced unspent sums into an Unspent CSR Account or a Schedule VII fund.

•

Skewed geography

The local-area preference concentrates money in Maharashtra, Karnataka and Gujarat, leaving the North-East and aspirational districts short.

•

Capacity and diversion

Scarce credible NGOs and routing through promoters' own trusts led the 2021 Rules to require Form CSR-1 registration of implementing agencies.

•

Outlay over outcome

Companies report rupees spent, and only those with a CSR obligation of Rs 10 crore or more must assess impact.

Other Provisions of the Act and Their Implications
•

Board reform

Section 149 mandates one-third independent directors on listed boards and at least one woman director, improving oversight and diversity.

•

Auditor rotation

Section 139 rotates auditors after fixed terms, curbing the cosy ties exposed in Satyam.

•

Investor protection

Class action suits under Section 245 and a statutory SFIO under Section 211 raise the cost of fraud.

•

One Person Company and NCLT

Sole entrepreneurs gain limited liability, and the NCLT, set up in 2016, centralised company disputes, though compliance costs rise for small firms.

Conclusion
Mandatory CSR and the 2013 governance reforms have drawn corporate India into inclusive growth; if spending follows need and is judged by impact, CSR can become a true partner of SDG 8 and Viksit Bharat 2047.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: How Section 135 Works. How Section 135 Works. Flow: Crosses size threshold → Board CSR committee → CSR policy, Schedule VII → Spend 2% of profit → Report or explain
Diagram: How Section 135 Works

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Inclusive Growth11 questions

Asked in 9 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
1
2015
–
2016
3
2017
1
2018
–
2019
1
2020
1
2021
–
2022
1
2023
1
2024
–
2025
–
2026
1

All 11 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2013 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·