National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India can be most effective when its tasks are adequately…

Question

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India can be most effective when its tasks are adequately supported by other mechanisms that ensure the accountability of a government. In light of above observation assess the role of NHRC as an effective complement to the judiciary and other institutions in promoting and protecting human rights standards.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

The NHRC is an effective complement to the judiciary and other commissions, widening access to justice and feeding courts with findings, but its impact depends on government compliance. In Paramjit Kaur (1996) the Supreme Court entrusted it with the Punjab mass cremations matter.

**Introduction**

The NHRC, set up under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 in line with the Paris Principles, makes only recommendations. As the observation implies, its impact depends on governments, courts and other bodies acting on what it finds.

**NHRC as a Complement to the Judiciary**

1. **Accessible forum**: It inquires suo motu or on a petition with civil court powers, offering poor victims a free and faster remedy than litigation.
2. **Aid to courts**: In Paramjit Kaur (1996) the Supreme Court entrusted it with the Punjab mass cremations matter, in which it ordered compensation for victims' families.
3. **Custodial accountability**: Its rule that custodial deaths be reported within 24 hours reinforces D.K. Basu (1997) and the encounter norms of PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2014).

SKETCH: flow | How NHRC Redress Travels
- Complaint or suo motu
- Inquiry with civil powers
- Recommendation to government
- Action-taken report, one month
- Court petition if ignored

**NHRC Alongside Other Institutions**

1. **Coordinating hub**: Chairpersons of the NCW, NCSC, NCST, NCM, NCBC and NCPCR are deemed members, linking rights work across groups.
2. **Policy prod**: Its advisory on transgender persons, issued after visiting Garima Greh shelters under the SMILE scheme, pressed ministries to close welfare gaps.
3. **Structural limits**: A one-year limit on complaints, only a reporting role over the armed forces, borrowed investigators and GANHRI's 2023 deferral of its 'A' status show how far it depends on others.

**Conclusion**

The NHRC is an effective complement rather than a substitute: it widens access and feeds courts and commissions with findings. Binding, time-limited government responses and its own investigation cadre would let it fully serve Article 21.

Model answer

Practise this question

Statutory Bodies6 questions

Ghissu