2023 · GS Paper 2 · Q7 · 10 marks

Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions.

In short

The CCI curbs abuse of dominance by multinationals under Section 4 of the Competition Act, fining Google ₹1,337.76 crore (Android) and ₹936.44 crore (Play billing) in 2022 and Meta ₹213.14 crore in 2024. Its bite is limited because ₹18,512 crore of ₹20,350 crore in penalties were stayed or set aside on appeal.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 bars dominant firms from unfair terms, denying market access or leveraging power. The CCI's October 2022 orders against Google, totalling over ₹2,200 crore, showed its resolve to discipline global giants.
Recent Decisions Against Dominant Multinationals
•

Google Android (2022)

A ₹1,337.76 crore penalty for forced pre-installation and default search, upheld by the NCLAT in 2023.

•

Google Play billing (2022)

₹936.44 crore for mandatory in-app billing, cut by the NCLAT to about ₹217 crore in 2025 with part of the abuse findings upheld.

•

Meta and WhatsApp (2024)

₹213.14 crore over the 2021 privacy policy, with a five-year ban on ad data-sharing that the NCLAT stayed.

•

Sharper teeth

The 2023 amendment allows penalties on global turnover, and Section 32 reaches conduct abroad that harms Indian markets.

Limits on the CCI's Reach
•

Appellate erosion

The Standing Committee on Finance (2025) found ₹18,512 crore of ₹20,350 crore in penalties stayed or set aside.

•

Slow enforcement

The Android probe ran from 2019 to 2022, long enough for the market to tip towards the incumbent.

•

Capacity and ex-ante gaps

The same committee found 42% of sanctioned posts vacant, and the draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, with prior obligations on large digital firms, is not yet law.

Conclusion
The CCI has proved that global market power gives no licence for unfair conduct in India. Faster appeals, fuller staffing and ex-ante digital rules will turn that resolve into lasting deterrence.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Life of a Dominance Case. Life of a Dominance Case. Flow: Complaint or suo motu → DG investigation → CCI order (Section 27) → NCLAT appeal → Supreme Court
Diagram: Life of a Dominance Case

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Statutory Bodies6 questions

Asked in 5 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
1
2015
–
2016
–
2017
1
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
2
2024
–
2025
–
2026
–

All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2023 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·