2014 · GS Paper 2 · Q20 · 12 marks

WTO is an important international institution where decisions taken affect countries in a profound manner. What is the mandate of WTO and how binding are their decisions? Critically analyse India's stand on the latest round of talks on Food security.

In short

The WTO administers trade agreements, hosts negotiations and settles disputes whose rulings bind members through reverse consensus and authorised retaliation. India held up the Trade Facilitation Agreement in July 2014 until the Bali peace clause shielding its food stockholding was extended indefinitely in November 2014.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction

The WTO, created by the Marrakesh Agreement in 1995, covers nearly 98% of world trade (RIS, 2024), and its farm rules collided with India's National Food Security Act, 2013 at the Bali Ministerial in 2013.

Mandate of the WTO and Binding Force of Its Decisions

1. Mandate: It administers GATT, GATS, TRIPS and the Agreement on Agriculture on most-favoured-nation and national treatment, hosts negotiations such as the Doha Round, and reviews trade policies. 2. Binding rulings: The Dispute Settlement Understanding adopts rulings by reverse consensus, which is why India amended its patent law in 1999 after the US mailbox dispute.

WTO Dispute Settlement → Consultations → Panel report → Appellate Body → DSB adoption → Compliance or retaliation

3. Limits: Enforcement rests on retaliation that small economies cannot wield, and consensus lets one member stall new rules.

India's Stand on Food Security at Bali and After
•

Core demand

India sought to procure grain at MSP for public stocks without breaching the 10% de minimis cap, measured against outdated 1986-88 prices.

•

Hard bargaining

Since Bali gave only an interim peace clause, India held up the Trade Facilitation Agreement protocol in July 2014 until the November 2014 General Council extended it until a permanent solution.

•

Balance

The stand was just, since developed members hold about 95% of AMS entitlements (RIS, 2025), but it cost India a deal-breaker image and left onerous notification conditions in place.

Conclusion
The WTO binds most firmly where it adjudicates, and India used that order to win policy space rather than exit it. A permanent stockholding solution with an updated reference price would reconcile food security with open trade.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: WTO Dispute Settlement. WTO Dispute Settlement. Flow: Consultations → Panel report → Appellate Body → DSB adoption → Compliance or retaliation
Diagram: WTO Dispute Settlement

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Institutions12 questions

Asked in 10 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
2
2015
1
2016
2
2017
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
1
2026
–

All 12 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2014 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·