2014 · GS Paper 3 · Q5 · 12 marks

The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 has come into effect from 1st January, 2014. What are the key issues which would get addressed with the Act in place? What implications would it have on industrialization and agriculture in India?

In short

The LARR Act, 2013 tackles undervalued compensation, coercive acquisition, ignored livelihood losers and idle land banking, while raising industry's land costs and shielding farmland. Its core fix is market-linked compensation of up to four times rural value with 70-80% consent and mandatory rehabilitation.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The LARR Act, 2013 replaced the colonial Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after Singur (2006-08) and Nandigram (2007) showed that forced acquisition had lost legitimacy. It turns eminent domain into a negotiated, compensated transfer.
Key Issues the LARR Act Addresses
•

Undervalued compensation

Circle-rate awards built on understated sale deeds ignored real prices; a rural multiplier of up to two plus 100% solatium now ties payment to market value.

•

Coercion and silence

A mandatory Social Impact Assessment and Gram Sabha consent in Fifth Schedule areas give affected families a voice.

•

Invisible livelihood losers

Walter Fernandes estimated about 60 million people displaced after 1947; tenants and labourers now get a house, a job or annuity.

•

Land banking

Land unused for five years reverts, and 40% of any resale windfall is shared with original owners.

Implications for Industrialisation and Agriculture
•

Costlier industrial land

Consent and SIA lengthen timelines, prompting the lapsed 2014 ordinance and state amendments in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Telangana.

•

Fewer stalled projects

Fair terms cut unrest; the Supreme Court quashed the Singur acquisition in 2016 after Tata moved to Sanand.

•

Food-security safeguard

Section 10 allows acquiring irrigated multi-cropped land only as a last resort, with equivalent wasteland developed.

•

Mixed farm gains

Compensation gives capital to diversify, but unrecorded sharecroppers often miss R&R.

Conclusion
The Act corrects the price, consent, rehabilitation and land-hoarding failures of the 1894 regime. Land pooling and digitised records can let India industrialise with the farmer's consent rather than at his cost.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: 1894 Act vs LARR Act 2013. 1894 Act vs LARR Act 2013. Comparison of 1894 Act and LARR Act 2013
Diagram: 1894 Act vs LARR Act 2013

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Land Reforms in India7 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
1
2015
1
2016
1
2017
–
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
–
2026
–

All 7 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2014 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·