2016 · GS Paper 4 · Q13 · 25 marks

ABC Ltd. is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding and generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company's decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The Government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. (a) Identify the issues involved in the case. (b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company's goal and to address the residents' concerns?

In short

The case pits Corporate Growth against Community Well-being, with CSR used as persuasion, a trust deficit and an unresponsive government at its core. Prior consultation, local jobs, co-designed CSR and a community fund from the plant's 20% cost saving can satisfy both the company and Vikaspuri's residents.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The core dilemma is between Corporate Growth, investment and jobs for a backward region, and Community Well-being, the residents' right to shape the change that will reshape their lives.
(a) Issues Involved in the Case
•

Development versus autonomy

Regional balance is served, but residents bear the costs and were never consulted.

•

CSR as persuasion

Using Section 135 CSR to "educate" people after the decision treats it as public relations.

•

Trust deficit

Residents fear inflation and an influx of outsiders, so protest becomes their only voice.

•

Unresponsive government

A tax holiday for the company but no hearing for residents suggests Regulatory Capture.

•

Unequal gains

Cost savings and tax benefits go to shareholders while locals bear the costs.

(b) Suggestions to Meet the Company's Goal and Residents' Concerns
•

Consult first

A Social Impact Assessment and public hearing on the lines of the 2013 land acquisition law [scheme].

•

Learn from Singur

Tata's Nano plant left Singur in 2008 and the Supreme Court quashed the acquisition in 2016 [case].

•

Local jobs

Reserve jobs and supply contracts for residents, train youth at an ITI and build worker housing to curb rents.

•

Co-designed CSR

A gram sabha and company committee chooses projects, reported in SEBI's BRSR [scheme].

•

Share gains

Part of the 20% saving funds a community fund on the District Mineral Foundation model [scheme].

Justification:
Kant's Categorical Imperative: residents must be treated as ends whose consent matters, never as mere means.
Conclusion
If ABC Ltd. acts as a trustee of the region, Vikaspuri gains jobs without losing its social fabric, and the company gains a lasting social licence to operate.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Corporate Growth vs Community Well-being. Corporate Growth vs Community Well-being. Venn diagram: Corporate Growth, Community Well-being; overlap: Shared-value plant with local consent
Diagram: Corporate Growth vs Community Well-being

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Development versus Rights Dilemmas5 questions

Asked in 4 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
2
2015
–
2016
1
2017
–
2018
1
2019
–
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
1
2026
–

All 5 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2016 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·