2017 · GS Paper 2 · Q8 · 10 marks

Hunger and poverty are the biggest challenges for good governance in India still today. Evaluate how far successive governments have progressed in dealing with these humongous problems. Suggest measures for improvement.

In short

Successive governments have largely ended famine and sharply reduced income poverty through food self-sufficiency, MGNREGA and the rights-based NFSA, but nutrition security still lags. NITI Aayog estimates that 24.82 crore people escaped multidimensional poverty between 2013-14 and 2022-23, yet NFHS-5 found 35.5% of children stunted.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Article 47 makes nutrition a primary duty of the State, and PUCL (2001) read the right to food into Article 21. Yet the Global Hunger Index 2025 ranks India 102 of 123, so poverty and hunger remain the core test of good governance.
Progress of Successive Governments on Poverty and Hunger
•

Poverty falls steeply

Poverty on the Tendulkar line fell from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 21.9% in 2011-12, and NITI Aayog estimates that 24.82 crore people escaped multidimensional poverty between 2013-14 and 2022-23.

•

Rights-based food security

The NFSA 2013 made subsidised grain a legal entitlement, and PMGKAY now gives free grain to 81 crore people till December 2028.

•

Nutrition lags behind

NFHS-5 (2019-21) still found 35.5% of children stunted, and the Shanta Kumar Committee (2015) estimated 40-50% PDS leakage, so calorie security has not become nutrition security.

Measures to Improve Outcomes
•

Nutrition-sensitive PDS

Add pulses, millets and fortified rice to the ration basket under POSHAN 2.0, so cheap calories also carry protein.

•

Plug leakages

Extend One Nation One Ration Card and end-to-end computerisation to every migrant household.

•

Livelihood graduation

Link MGNREGA, DAY-NRLM credit and skilling, as Kerala's Kudumbashree shows, so families move from transfers to incomes.

•

Outcome monitoring

Track stunting and multidimensional poverty district-wise through the Poshan Tracker and reward States on outcomes.

Conclusion
Governments have largely conquered famine and mass income poverty, but hidden hunger persists. Shifting from food security to nutrition and livelihood security, judged by outcomes, will fulfil Article 47 and SDGs 1 and 2.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Anti-poverty and Food Security Policy. Anti-poverty and Food Security Policy. Diagram (timeline): Anti-poverty and Food Security Policy; 1965; Green Revolution, FCI; 1975; ICDS launched; 1997; Targeted PDS; 2005; MGNREGA; 2013; NFSA; 2020
Diagram: Anti-poverty and Food Security Policy

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Poverty and Hunger4 questions

Asked in 4 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
1
2017
1
2018
–
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
1
2025
–
2026
–

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2017 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·