2017 · GS Paper 2 · Q14 · 15 marks

To enhance the quality of democracy in India the Election Commission of India has proposed electoral reforms in 2016. What are the suggested reforms and how far are they significant to make democracy successful?

In short

The ECI's 2016 proposals sought to bar charge-sheeted candidates, clean party funding, criminalise paid news and shield Election Commissioners, which would make elections fairer as well as free. Only the ₹2,000 cap on anonymous cash donations became law, in the Finance Act 2017.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction

Article 324 gives the Election Commission control of elections, but only Parliament can change electoral law. In December 2016 the ECI sent the Law Ministry a package of proposals to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Electoral Reforms Suggested by the ECI in 2016

1. Decriminalisation: Bar candidates charged with offences punishable by five years or more, and make a false affidavit punishable with two years and disqualification. 2. Party funding: Ban anonymous donations of ₹2,000 and above and empower the ECI to deregister paper parties. 3. Inducements: Make paid news an electoral offence and bribery cognisable; stop government publicity ads six months before a term ends. 4. Institutional strength: Equal removal protection for ECs, an independent secretariat, contempt powers, totalisers and one candidate, one seat.

How Far the Reforms Can Make Democracy Successful
•

Purer representation

ADR finds 46% of MPs elected in 2024 declaring criminal cases; charge-stage disqualification would act at the source, if guarded against motivated cases.

•

Clean money

The ₹2,000 cash cap came in 2017, but electoral bonds, struck down in ADR v. Union of India (2024), show partial reform shifts opacity.

•

Trusted umpire

Removal protection for ECs would complete Anoop Baranwal (2023), which the 2023 appointment law diluted.

Way Forward
•

One comprehensive Bill

Enact the package with fast-track courts and an Article 324(5) amendment.

Conclusion
The proposals target who contests, how money flows and how independent the referee is. With only one enacted, their promise is large but unrealised until Parliament turns free elections into fair ones.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: 2016 Proposals: Where They Stand. 2016 Proposals: Where They Stand. Comparison of ECI proposal and Status
Diagram: 2016 Proposals: Where They Stand

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Constitutional Bodies14 questions

Asked in 9 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
1
2017
1
2018
4
2019
1
2020
–
2021
1
2022
2
2023
–
2024
1
2025
1
2026
2

All 14 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2017 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·