2019 · GS Paper 2 · Q10 · 10 marks

Too little cash, too much politics, leaves UNESCO fighting for life.' Discuss the statement in the light of US' withdrawal and its accusation of the cultural body as being 'anti-Israel bias'.

In short

UNESCO is underfunded and politicised: the US cut about 22 percent of its budget after Palestine joined in 2011 and left in 2018 alleging anti-Israel bias. Yet it survived, won the US back in 2023, and remains indispensable for heritage, education and AI ethics.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction

UNESCO, founded in 1945 to build "the defences of peace" in the minds of men, lost the United States and Israel at the end of 2018 over alleged anti-Israel bias, and faces a third US exit in December 2026.

Too Little Cash: UNESCO's Funding Fragility

UNESCO and the US → 1984 :: US exits → 2003 :: US rejoins → 2011 :: Palestine admitted → 2018 :: US, Israel exit → 2023 :: US returns → 2026 :: Third exit due

1. Loss of the largest payer: US laws triggered by Palestine's 2011 admission cut about 22 percent of the regular budget, and the US lost its vote in 2013. 2. Programme cuts: Frozen posts and trimmed education and science programmes pushed UNESCO toward earmarked donor money that bends priorities toward funders. 3. Funding as leverage: Japan withheld 2016 dues over the Nanjing Massacre documents, showing how big payers can hold the budget hostage.

Too Much Politics: Heritage as a Battleground
•

The anti-Israel charge

2016 resolutions naming Jerusalem's holy sites only as Haram al-Sharif and the 2017 listing of Hebron as a Palestinian site triggered the exits.

•

Bloc voting

Heritage and board decisions follow regional blocs, echoing the MacBride Report quarrel behind the 1984 exit.

•

Resilience nonetheless

UNESCO survived both exits, won the US back in 2023, and still runs work no one else does, from the World Heritage list, where India has 45 sites, to the 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.

Conclusion
The statement is largely valid but overstated: UNESCO is underfunded and politicised, not dying, because its normative work keeps members returning. Broader assessed funding and depoliticised heritage decisions would restore its founding mission.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: UNESCO and the US. UNESCO and the US. Diagram (timeline): UNESCO and the US; 1984; US exits; 2003; US rejoins; 2011; Palestine admitted; 2018; US, Israel exit; 2023; US returns; 2026
Diagram: UNESCO and the US

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Institutions12 questions

Asked in 10 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
2
2015
1
2016
2
2017
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
1
2026
–

All 12 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2019 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·