2021 · GS Paper 2 · Q2 · 10 marks

Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.

In short

Greater representation of women in the higher judiciary is desirable because it brings diverse perspectives, more equitable treatment of litigants and inclusive legitimacy to the courts. The Supreme Court has had only 12 women judges since 1950, and women hold about 14% of High Court posts.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Supreme Court has had only 12 women judges since 1950, and women hold about 14% of High Court posts (Feminism in India, 2026), even as the then CJI N.V. Ramana said in 2021 that women deserve 50% representation as a matter of right.
Why Greater Representation Is Desirable
•

Diversity of perspective

Women judges bring lived experience to cases on sexual violence, family and work, enriching deliberation without diluting merit.

•

Equity for litigants

In Aparna Bhat (2021), the Supreme Court set aside a bail condition asking an accused to have the complainant tie him a rakhi and warned against gender stereotyping.

•

Inclusive legitimacy

Courts earn trust when women see themselves on the bench, serving SDG 16.7's call for representative decision-making.

•

Role models

Justice B.V. Nagarathna, in line to be the first woman CJI in 2027, draws more women into the profession.

Barriers and the Path to Parity
•

Opaque collegium

Appointments since the Second Judges Case (1993) follow no published diversity criterion.

•

Entry hurdles

A mandatory Bar practice rule for civil judges, set at three years in 2025 and cut to one in 2026, may still deter young women lawyers facing family pressure early in their careers.

•

Remedies

A diversity clause in the Memorandum of Procedure, more women senior advocates and women's reservation in subordinate judicial services, as Bihar provides.

Conclusion
Greater representation of women in the higher judiciary is highly desirable, making justice more diverse, equitable and inclusive. A transparent, diversity-conscious appointment process would carry constitutional morality into the composition of the bench itself.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: The Leaking Judicial Pipeline. The Leaking Judicial Pipeline. Pyramid, top to bottom: Supreme Court: 12 ever, High Courts: about 14%, Lower courts: about 38%
Diagram: The Leaking Judicial Pipeline

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Structure, Organization and Functioning of the Union Judiciary7 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
1
2015
–
2016
1
2017
1
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
–
2026
1

All 7 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2021 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·