"Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right…

Question

"Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation." Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Returning refugees to persecution violates human dignity, the right to life and equal moral worth, and democracies that claim openness betray their own values when they do it. Hirsi Jamaa v Italy (2012) held sea pushbacks to Libya a breach of non-refoulement.

**Introduction**

Non-refoulement, in Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention, forbids returning a person to persecution. A democracy that pushes refugees back betrays the very values that give it moral authority.

**Why Non-Refoulement Is an Ethical Duty**

1. **Human dignity**: Kant's **categorical imperative** forbids using a person merely as a means; returning someone to torture makes them a pawn of border politics.
2. **Right to life**: In NHRC v State of Arunachal Pradesh (1996), the Supreme Court protected Chakma refugees under Article 21, which covers all persons.
3. **Hospitality and burden-sharing**: India sheltered Tibetans in 1959 and East Pakistani refugees in 1971, and the Global Compact on Refugees (2018) treats protection as a shared duty.

**Ethical Dimensions Violated by Open Democracies**

SKETCH: comparison | Professed Values vs Practice
a: Open society claims
b: Refugee practice
- Dignity for all :: Pushbacks at sea
- Rule of law :: Offshore processing
- Equal concern :: Selective welcome
- Due process :: Detention without hearing

1. **Dual standards**: Europe welcomed Ukrainians in 2022 but met Syrians and Afghans with fences, denying equal moral worth.
2. **Rule of law bent**: Hirsi Jamaa v Italy (ECtHR, 2012) held sea pushbacks to Libya unlawful, and the UK Supreme Court struck down the Rwanda plan in 2023.
3. **Compassion traded for deterrence**: Australia's prolonged offshore detention on Nauru and Manus Island sacrificed individual asylum seekers to send a deterrent signal.
4. **Security versus conscience**: India deported Rohingya men in 2018, and in Mohammad Salimullah (2021) the Supreme Court declined to halt deportations that follow procedure, leaving the risk of persecution unweighed.

**Conclusion**

The statement is ethically sound: security fears justify screening, burden-sharing and due process, never return to persecution. A democracy proves its openness when protecting strangers is costly, as constitutional morality under Article 21 demands.

"Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation." Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society.

Model answer

Practise this question

Ethical issues in international relations and funding9 questions

Ghissu