In international relations, ethical considerations are often subjugated to the strategic interests of…

Question

In international relations, ethical considerations are often subjugated to the strategic interests of nation-states. Discuss this from an ethical perspective.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Strategic interest often subordinates ethics in international relations, through selective silence, vaccine nationalism and delayed climate finance, but ethics still shapes conduct where interest and morality converge. India's Vaccine Maitri (2021), reaching nearly 100 countries, shows humanitarian action building goodwill.

**Introduction**

Hans Morgenthau held that states act in terms of "interest defined in terms of power". Contemporary diplomacy often bears this out, yet ethics is not absent from international relations; it is bargained against interest.

**How Strategic Interest Subjugates Ethics**

1. **Selective Silence**: Security Council vetoes have repeatedly blocked action on Syria and Gaza whenever a permanent member's ally was involved.
2. **Arms Before Rights**: Weapons and energy deals continue with regimes accused of abuses, a case of **moral myopia**.
3. **Vaccine Nationalism**: Rich countries pre-booked COVID-19 doses far beyond their needs, and the TRIPS waiver proposed by India and South Africa in 2020 emerged only diluted in June 2022.
4. **Climate Burden-Shifting**: The $100 billion a year climate finance pledge of 2009 was met only in 2022, as per the OECD.

**Where Ethics Still Shapes State Conduct**

1. **The Statesman's Duty**: Max Weber's **ethics of responsibility** makes pursuing citizens' interest a moral duty, so long as others' basic rights are not trampled.
2. **Enlightened Self-Interest**: India's Vaccine Maitri (2021) reached nearly 100 countries and Operation Dost (2023) aided Turkey and Syria, earning goodwill.

SKETCH: matrix | Interest and Ethics in Foreign Policy
cols: Ethics ignored | Ethics upheld
rows: Interest served | Interest unserved
tl: Realpolitik
tr: Enlightened interest
bl: Moral failure
br: Costly idealism

3. **Norms That Bind Power**: The Montreal Protocol (1987), the Responsibility to Protect (2005) and the Paris Agreement (2015) show states accepting ethical limits when collective survival is at stake.

**Conclusion**

The subordination of ethics to interest is real but neither inevitable nor justified. Kant's cosmopolitan duty and India's Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, its G20 theme of 2023, show that long-run interest and morality converge, so ethics should bound national interest, not be its price.

In international relations, ethical considerations are often subjugated to the strategic interests of nation-states. Discuss this from an ethical perspective.

Model answer

Practise this question

Ethical issues in international relations and funding9 questions

Ghissu