2021 · GS Paper 4 · Q7 · 20 marks

Sunil is a young civil servant and has a reputation for his competence, integrity, dedication and relentless pursuit of difficult and onerous jobs. Considering his profile, he was picked up by his bosses to handle a very challenging and sensitive assignment. He was posted in a tribal dominated district notorious for illegal sand mining. Excavating sand from river belt and transporting through trucks and selling them in black market was rampant. This illegal sand mining mafia was operating with the support of local functionaries and tribal musclemen who in turn were bribing selected poor tribals and had kept the tribals under fear and intimidation. Sunil being a sharp and energetic officer immediately grasped the ground realities and the modus operandi followed by the mafia through their devious and dubious mechanism. On making inquiries, he gathered that some of their own office employees are in hand and glove with them and have developed close unholy nexus. Sunil initiated stringent action against them and started conducting raids on their illegal operations of movement of trucks filled with sand. The mafia got rattled as not many officers in the past had taken such strong steps against the mafia. Some of the office employees who were allegedly close to mafia informed them that the officer is determined to clean up the mafia's illegal sand mining operations in that district and may cause them irreparable damage. The mafia turned hostile and launched counter-offensive. The tribal musclemen and mafia started threatening him with dire consequences. His family (wife and old mother) were stalked and were under virtual surveillance and thus causing mental torture, agony and stress to all of them. The matter assumed serious proportions when a muscleman came to his office and threatened him to stop raids, etc., otherwise, his fate will not be different than some of his predecessors (ten years back one officer was killed by the mafia). (a) Identify the different options available to Sunil in attending to this situation. (b) Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you. (c) Which of the above, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Sunil to adopt and why?

In short

Sunil's best option is to continue the drive against illegal sand mining with institutional backing: reporting the threats, protecting his family, purging colluding staff and making enforcement systemic. The MoEFCC's 2020 sand-mining enforcement guidelines, with GPS-tracked trucks and drone surveys, keep the drive from depending on one officer.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Sunil's raids have frightened the mafia, which now targets his family. The core dilemma is between Public Duty and Family Welfare, amid issues of a staff-mafia nexus, intimidation and coerced tribals.
(a) Options Available to Sunil
Sunil can halt the raids, escalate alone, seek a transfer, focus on tribal welfare first, or continue with institutional backing.
(b) Critical Evaluation of Each Option
•

(i) CAPITULATE [Compromised-Hybrid]

Halting raids relieves the family but rewards intimidation, a Moral Myopia.

•

(ii) CONFRONT [Strict-Legal]

Escalating alone signals resolve but risks Premature Martyrdom.

•

(iii) EVADE [Procedural-Evasive]

A transfer ends his risk but is Moral Escapism that hands a bolder mafia to the next officer.

•

(iv) COMPROMISE [Empathetic-Humanitarian]

Welfare first builds trust, but the river's plunder continues.

•

(v) RECONCILE ✓ [Balanced]

Continue with institutional backing (recommended).

(c) Most Appropriate Option and Why
•

Secure the family

FIR on the threat, written report to seniors and protection, with witness protection for tribals per Mahender Chawla (2018) [case].

•

Systemic enforcement

Remove leaky staff and use the MoEFCC's 2020 sand-mining enforcement guidelines [committee/report] with GPS and drones.

•

Empower tribals

Prior gram sabha recommendation for minor-mineral leases under PESA, 1996, and sand cooperatives. Narendra Kumar's killing in 2012 [officer] shows why courage needs institutions.

Justification:
Nishkama Karma: duty without fear of the fruit, with the state protecting the officer.
Conclusion
By making his crusade institutional, Sunil honours duty and family together and shows that the state, not one officer, stands against the mafia.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Public Duty vs Family Welfare. Public Duty vs Family Welfare. Venn diagram: Public Duty, Family Welfare; overlap: Institution-backed enforcement
Diagram: Public Duty vs Family Welfare

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Police and Law Enforcement Dilemmas6 questions

Asked in 5 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
–
2024
2
2025
–
2026
1

All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2021 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·