2024 · GS Paper 4 · Q2(b) · 10 marks
Global warming and climate change are the outcomes of human greed in the name of development, indicating the direction in which extinction of organisms including human beings is heading towards loss of life on Earth. How do you put an end to this to protect life and bring equilibrium between the society and the environment?
In short
Ending climate change needs a shift from greed to need, through individual restraint, corporate trusteeship, rights-based law and global climate justice. The Supreme Court in M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India (2024) recognised a right against the adverse effects of climate change under Articles 14 and 21.
Model answer
Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026 · 272 words
Need over greed
Mission LiFE (2022) promotes mindful consumption, echoing the Isha Upanishad's *tena tyaktena bhunjitha*, enjoy through renunciation.
Trusteeship in markets
SEBI's BRSR makes the top 1,000 listed companies disclose their environmental footprint, Gandhi's trusteeship in modern form.
Ecocentric ethos
The Bishnois of Khejarli (1730) and the Chipko Movement (1973) show communities as guardians of nature, and honest impact assessments carry that intergenerational equity into office.
Rights-based law
*M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India* (2024) recognised a right against the adverse effects of climate change under Articles 14 and 21.
Clean growth
India reached 50% non-fossil installed power capacity in 2025, five years ahead of its 2030 NDC goal, and has pledged net zero by 2070.
Climate justice and life
The Loss and Damage Fund (COP28, 2023) looks to historic emitters to pay for harm, and the Kunming-Montreal Framework (2022) protects 30% of land and sea for all species.
This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Practise this question
1Get the answer sheet
Sized for this question.
2Write your answer
Timed, by hand.
3Get it marked
Your score and what to fix.
This chapter in the exam
Dimensions of ethics13 questions
Asked in 8 of 14 sittings since 2013
- 2026Citing the serious adverse effects of long-term medication, a doctor convinces the family of a female patient for surgery. This led the patient to reluctantly consent for the surgery, though her original choice was to opt for medication. Explain the concepts of paternalism and beneficence by analysing the doctor's action.
- 2026Some moral philosophers argue that spending some of your resources—without significantly affecting your financial stability—to help other people who badly suffer is our moral duty and not merely a matter of charity. Justify this claim by explaining the distinction between duty and charity.
All 13 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.
Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.