"It is not enough to talk about peace, one must believe in it; and it is not enough to believe in it, one…

Question

"It is not enough to talk about peace, one must believe in it; and it is not enough to believe in it, one must act upon it." In the present context, the major weapon industries of the developed nations are adversely influencing continuation of number of wars for their own self-interest, all around the world. What are the ethical considerations of the powerful nations in today's international arena to stop continuation of ongoing conflicts?

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Powerful nations must put peace above arms-industry profit through restraint in arms transfers, consistent principles, mediation and accountability for war crimes. The United States alone made 43% of global arms exports in 2020-24 (SIPRI, 2025).

**Introduction**

Eleanor Roosevelt's words expose the gap between speaking of peace and working for it. World military spending hit a record 2,718 billion dollars in 2024 (SIPRI, 2025) as wars in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan dragged on.

**Ethical Considerations for Powerful Nations**

1. **Peace over profit**: Profiting from wars one claims to oppose shows **conflict of interest blindness**; the United States made 43% of global arms exports in 2020-24 (SIPRI, 2025).
2. **Responsibility with power**: Most permanent members of the Security Council are major arms exporters, so their Charter duty to keep peace collides with commercial interest and demands restraint.
3. **Consistency**: Condemning attacks on civilians in one war while arming the attackers in another reflects **compassion asymmetry**, a selective empathy.
4. **Restraint in transfers**: The Arms Trade Treaty (2014) bars transfers that would be used for war crimes, and powers should honour its spirit even where it is unratified.

**From Belief to Action on Peace**

SKETCH: flow-cycle | The War-Profit Loop
- Arms sales
- Prolonged conflict
- Industry profits
- Export lobbying

1. **Mediation**: The United States, Egypt, Qatar and Turkey brokered the Gaza ceasefire of October 2025, echoing India's "this is not an era of war".
2. **Humanitarian access**: The UN and Turkey brokered Black Sea Grain Initiative (2022) protected food supplies mid-war.
3. **Accountability**: Backing the ICC for allies and rivals alike makes impunity costly.
4. **Peace dividend**: Shifting military money to rebuilding addresses the grievances that feed wars, in line with SDG 16.

**Conclusion**

Powerful nations cannot believe in peace while profiting from war; their duty is restraint in arms, consistency in principle and leadership in mediation. Gandhi's insistence on pure means and India's Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam show how peace is acted upon, not merely spoken of.

Model answer

Practise this question

Ethical issues in international relations and funding9 questions

Ghissu