2024 · GS Paper 4 · Q1(a) · 10 marks

The application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view.

In short

AI can be a dependable input for administration, bringing impartiality, speed and evidence, but not a dependable decider, because it encodes bias, blurs accountability and cannot weigh compassion. The Dutch childcare-benefits algorithm scandal, which brought down the government in 2021, shows the cost of removing human judgement.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Herbert Simon showed that administrators decide under bounded rationality, with limited time, information and attention. AI promises to widen those bounds, but whether it is a dependable input turns on fairness, accountability and the place of human judgement.
Ethical Gains AI Offers Administration
•

Impartiality

Uniform criteria narrow the discretion that breeds favouritism; Faceless Assessment (2020) allots income-tax cases by algorithm to cut taxpayer-officer contact.

•

Evidence over hunch

Analysing large datasets lets officers target welfare and inspections on need rather than influence.

•

Efficiency as duty

Screening thousands of applications or grievances quickly honours the citizen's right to timely decisions.

Ethical Limits on Relying on AI
•

Encoded bias

Amazon scrapped a hiring tool in 2018 after it downgraded women, and ProPublica (2016) found racial bias in COMPAS risk scores.

•

Accountability gap

A Dutch fraud-detection algorithm wrongly hounded thousands of childcare-benefit families, and the government resigned in 2021; a black box cannot give the reasoned order natural justice requires.

•

Moral blindness

AI optimises a measurable target but cannot weigh compassion, dignity or the hard case at the margin.

•

Privacy

Citizen data in models engages Puttaswamy (2017) and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: AI Input and Human Judgement. AI Input and Human Judgement. Venn diagram: AI: data, speed, consistency, Officer: context, empathy, accountability; overlap: Human-in-the-loop decision
Diagram: AI Input and Human Judgement

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Dimensions of ethics13 questions

Asked in 8 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
2
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
–
2020
1
2021
1
2022
2
2023
1
2024
3
2025
–
2026
2

All 13 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·