2025 · GS Paper 2 · Q2 · 10 marks

Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021.

In short

Tribunals are needed beside courts for specialised, faster and cheaper justice, but the 2021 rationalisation trimmed their number more than it secured their independence. It abolished nine appellate bodies, and its tenure provisions were struck down by the Supreme Court in November 2025.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The 42nd Amendment (1976) added Articles 323A and 323B to move specialised disputes out of overburdened courts, and the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 later pruned this system in the name of rationalisation.
Why Tribunals Are Needed Beside Courts
•

Domain expertise

Technical members bring specialist knowledge, as in the NCLT for insolvency and the National Green Tribunal for environmental disputes.

•

Speed and low cost

Bound only by natural justice, tribunals spare litigants, such as government employees in service disputes before the CAT, the Code of Civil Procedure's rigid, costly steps.

•

Independence caveat

L. Chandra Kumar (1997) held that tribunals supplement, not supplant, High Courts, a safeguard that matters because members depend on parent ministries for appointment and funds.

Impact of the 2021 Rationalisation
•

Leaner structure

Nine appellate bodies, including the Intellectual Property Appellate Board and the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal, were abolished.

•

Specialised new homes

The Delhi High Court's Intellectual Property Division (2021) and Madras High Court's (2023) kept specialist handling.

•

Burden shifted

Other appeals moved to High Courts already carrying heavy backlogs, trading specialist speed for general delay.

•

Independence contested

The Act re-enacted the four-year tenure and minimum age of 50 struck down in Madras Bar Association (2021); in November 2025 the Supreme Court struck them down again and directed a National Tribunals Commission.

Conclusion
Tribunals remain necessary for speed and expertise, but the 2021 reform rationalised their number more than their independence. An autonomous National Tribunals Commission would secure the specialised, accessible justice that Article 39A envisages.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Tribunals vs Regular Courts. Tribunals vs Regular Courts. Comparison of Tribunals and Regular courts
Diagram: Tribunals vs Regular Courts

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Structure, Organization and Functioning of the States Judiciary4 questions

Asked in 4 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
1
2025
1
2026
–

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·