2025 · GS Paper 2 · Q14 · 15 marks

Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?

In short

Centre-State financial relations have moved from discretionary Planning Commission grants to formula-based devolution and pooled GST, and recent reforms have strengthened fiscal federalism only partly. Devolution rose to 42% under the Fourteenth Finance Commission, but unshared cesses rose to 20.2% of the Centre's gross tax revenue by 2020-21.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
States carry about 60% of public expenditure but collect about 35% of tax revenue (World Bank paper for the Sixteenth Finance Commission, 2025). How this gap is bridged has followed India's development model.
Evolving Pattern of Centre-State Financial Relations
•

Plan-era dual channel

Besides Article 280 devolution, the Planning Commission gave discretionary Article 282 grants under the Gadgil formula (1969), a parallel channel bypassing the constitutional body.

•

Liberalisation and discipline

The 80th Amendment (2000) pooled all central taxes, and debt relief tied to fiscal responsibility laws cut central loans from 15.8% of state liabilities (2005) to 3.5% (2019).

Impact of Recent Reforms on Fiscal Federalism
•

More untied money

The Fourteenth Finance Commission raised devolution to 42%, and the Sixteenth keeps 41% from 2026-27.

•

Pooled GST

States hold two-thirds of GST Council votes, and Mohit Minerals (2022) made its advice non-binding, but states lost VAT and compensation ended in 2022.

•

Cesses and curbs

Unshared cesses rose to 20.2% of gross tax revenue by 2020-21 (Union Budget data), and borrowing limits drove Kerala's Article 131 suit (2024).

Way Forward
•

Share and simplify

Fold excess cesses into the divisible pool and cut Centrally Sponsored Schemes to a flexible core, as the 2015 NITI Aayog sub-group of Chief Ministers urged.

•

Uniform rules

Apply the Sixteenth Commission's 3% deficit cap and the end of off-budget borrowing to both levels.

Conclusion
Reforms have strengthened fiscal federalism only partly: states get more untied money but fewer taxes of their own. Sharing cesses and trusting states with flexible funds would complete the shift.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Shift in Fiscal Federalism. Shift in Fiscal Federalism. Comparison of Planning era and Since 2015
Diagram: Shift in Fiscal Federalism

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Functions and Responsibilities of the Union and the States7 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
–
2015
–
2016
1
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
1
2025
1
2026
1

All 7 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·