2025 · GS Paper 4 · Q2(b) · 10 marks

Keeping the national security in mind, examine the ethical dilemmas related to controversies over environmental clearance of development projects in ecologically sensitive border areas in the country.

In short

Clearances in ecologically sensitive border areas pit national security against ecology, transparency, precaution and tribal consent, and the ethical course keeps precaution and consent while allowing speed and confidentiality. In 2021 the Supreme Court allowed 10-metre Char Dham defence roads modifying its own 2020 cap of 5.5 metres.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Char Dham road case of 2021, where the Defence Ministry sought wider roads for missile launchers, shows how border ecology turns a clearance into an ethical choice between defending the frontier and protecting fragile ecosystems.
Ethical Dilemmas in Border Clearances
•

Security vs Ecology

The Supreme Court in December 2021 allowed 10-metre widths for defence feeder roads, modifying its own 2020 order that had capped them at 5.5 metres for unstable slopes.

•

Secrecy vs Transparency

The NGT declined to quash the Great Nicobar clearances in 2023, but its high-powered committee's report was withheld on strategic grounds.

•

Speed vs Precaution

The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act, 2023 exempts strategic linear projects within 100 km of the border from forest clearance.

•

Nation vs Consent

The Shompen of Great Nicobar and Adi villages facing the Siang project question whether a frontier can be secured by overriding its own citizens.

Reconciling Security With Ecological Ethics
•

Ecology Is Security

Joshimath's 2023 subsidence, beside Army and ITBP bases, showed that degraded slopes endanger the garrisons they serve.

•

Accountable Confidentiality

Strategic details can go to a closed expert panel while ecological data stays public, since a just end needs just means.

•

Consent First

Gram sabha consultation under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 protects intergenerational equity and those with the least voice.

Conclusion
National security may justify speed and confidentiality, never the abandonment of precaution and consent. Constitutional morality under Articles 48A and 51A(g) demands frontier projects that the land and its people can survive.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn map: Ecologically sensitive border projects. Marked: Joshimath, Galathea Bay. Rivers: Brahmaputra.
Map: Ecologically sensitive border projects
Hand-drawn diagram: Border Project Ethics. Border Project Ethics. Venn diagram: National security, Ecological integrity; overlap: Resilient strategic infrastructure
Diagram: Border Project Ethics

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions13 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
1
2016
–
2017
1
2018
3
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
1
2023
–
2024
–
2025
2
2026
4

All 13 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·