2026 · GS Paper 4 · Q2(a) · 10 marks

An endangered tribe has developed a severe skeletal deformity. A university research has identified a mineral supplement as a possible remedy, though clinical trials are yet to be conducted. Should the District Magistrate (DM) use this research on the tribe? Discuss from the perspective of medical and administrative ethics.

In short

The DM should not order an untested mineral supplement for the tribe, because non-maleficence, informed consent and his limited competence forbid it, but he must not stay passive. Under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, the remedy must come through an approved, consented trial while proven care continues.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
An endangered tribe's suffering and an untested remedy place the DM between doing good and doing no harm. He should not order its use; the research must reach the tribe only through a regulated, consented trial.
The Medical Ethics Perspective
•

Non-maleficence first

Without trials the dose, toxicity and interactions are unknown, and excess minerals can themselves damage bone, so mass use could deepen the harm.

•

Informed consent

The Nuremberg Code (1947) made voluntary consent absolute, and the ICMR National Ethical Guidelines (2017) demand extra protection and community consultation for vulnerable groups, in their own language.

•

Justice, not experimentation

The Tuskegee study (1932 to 1972) shows how marginalised people become test subjects; an endangered tribe must not bear risks others would refuse.

The Administrative Ethics Perspective
•

Acting within competence

Under the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, a trial needs ethics committee approval and, where required, CDSCO permission, so a DM's order would be unlawful.

•

Urgent duty of care

Inaction is also a choice, as an endangered tribe is likely one of India's 75 Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups, whose survival the state holds in trust.

•

Find the cause

Skeletal deformity in parts of India stems from fluoride in water, so testing water, diet and genetics may yield a proven remedy faster.

Conclusion
The DM should probe the cause, provide proven nutrition and care, and press ICMR and the university for a fast-tracked, ethics-approved trial with the tribe's free consent. Compassion guided by prudence, Aristotle's phronesis, protects both health and dignity.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: The DM's Options. The DM's Options. Diagram (spectrum): The DM's Options; Inaction; Mass dosing; Probe the cause; Proven nutrition and care; Approved trial with consent
Diagram: The DM's Options

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions13 questions

Asked in 7 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
1
2016
–
2017
1
2018
3
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
1
2023
–
2024
–
2025
2
2026
4

All 13 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2026 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·