"Article 356 is more misused than used." — Comment.

Question

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Article 356 has historically been misused more than properly used, invoked over 126 times, often to dismiss opposition state governments without a floor test. Since the Bommai judgment (1994) made such proclamations subject to judicial review and floor tests, its misuse has sharply declined.

**Introduction**

Article 356 empowers the President to impose President’s Rule when a state’s constitutional machinery fails, but its frequent misuse has challenged India’s federal structure, as highlighted in the landmark S.R. Bommai v. Union of India⟦1⟧ (1994) judgment. This provision, originally intended as a safeguard, has often been invoked for political gains, raising concerns about its impact on democracy and federalism.

**Institutional Design and Constitutional Safeguards**

2. **Commission Recommendations**: The Sarkaria and Punchhi Commissions emphasized exhausting alternatives like Article 355 and paramilitary deployment, strict guidelines, and constitutional conventions to uphold federalism and prevent misuse. They advocated that Article 356 be a measure of last resort, used only in severe crises such as political deadlock or internal subversion.

**Implementation Challenges**

4. **Judicial and Political Reforms**: Post-S.R. Bommai, judicial scrutiny and coalition politics reduced misuse, but challenges remain in ensuring due process and cooperative federalism. Instances like the Uttarakhand case (2016) show denial of floor tests still occur, highlighting ongoing implementation gaps.

**Way Forward**

5. **Transparency and Judicial Empowerment**: Governor's reports should be made public and floor tests made mandatory before any proclamation, while prompt court adjudication can reinforce constitutional checks against misuse.

6. **Promoting Cooperative Federalism**: Dialogue platforms like the Inter-State Council can resolve conflicts amicably, reducing reliance on Article 356. Strengthening political maturity and respect for federalism, especially in sensitive states such as ==Andhra Pradesh==, is essential.

**Conclusion**

While Article 356 is a vital safeguard, its misuse has undermined federalism; judicial interventions and reforms are crucial to restore constitutional balance and protect democratic governance.

"Article 356 is more misused than used." — Comment.

Model answer

Practise this question

Judiciary in India15 questions

Ghissu