Critically examine the measures taken by the Indian government for improvement of food security.
In short
India's food security rests on the PDS, the National Food Security Act 2013 covering nearly two-thirds of people, nutrition schemes like ICDS and Mid-Day Meals, and farm schemes such as PMKSY. Leakages, cereal bias and climate stress limit results, and the Global Hunger Index 2023 still rates India 'serious'.
Model answer
Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026 · 903 words
Navigating the Complex Terrain of Food Security in India: A Critical Examination
In the heart of a bustling Indian village, a mother counts the grains of rice she has left, uncertain if it will last till the next ration day. This poignant image encapsulates the paradox of food security in India, a nation that feeds millions yet struggles to ensure that no one goes hungry. The concept of food security, defined by the FAO as access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food for all people at all times, remains a formidable challenge for India despite decades of policy interventions. The Indian government’s measures to improve food security reflect a complex interplay of ambitious schemes, structural challenges, and evolving socio-economic dynamics, demanding a critical examination of their effectiveness and limitations.
To begin with, the cornerstone of India’s food security framework is the Public Distribution System (PDS), which aims to provide subsidized food grains to the poor. Introduced in the 1940s and expanded post-Green Revolution, PDS has been pivotal in ensuring minimum food access. The National Food Security Act (NFSA) of 2013 legally entitles nearly two-thirds of the population to subsidized food grains, marking a significant policy milestone. However, the system grapples with issues of leakages, inefficiencies, and exclusion errors. Studies and audits have repeatedly found that a sizeable share of subsidised grain once leaked out of the system before Aadhaar-seeded ration cards and ePoS machines were introduced. Moreover, the system’s focus on cereals overlooks the nutritional diversity essential for combating malnutrition, a persistent problem in India. Thus, while PDS has expanded coverage, its capacity to guarantee nutritional security remains constrained.
Building upon this, the government’s emphasis on agricultural productivity through schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY) and the Soil Health Card initiative seeks to enhance food availability by boosting farmers’ yields. The Green Revolution’s legacy continues to influence these efforts, with a focus on staple crops such as wheat and rice. Yet, this approach has led to unintended consequences, including soil degradation, groundwater depletion, and reduced crop diversity, which threaten long-term sustainability. Additionally, small and marginal farmers, who constitute the majority, often lack access to credit, technology, and markets, limiting the impact of these schemes. This reveals a structural flaw: increasing production alone cannot ensure food security without addressing the socio-economic vulnerabilities of the farming community.
Moreover, the government has introduced direct benefit transfers (DBT) to reform subsidy delivery, aiming to reduce PDS leakages by transferring cash directly to beneficiaries’ bank accounts. Cash transfer pilots in Chandigarh, Puducherry and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, along with ePoS-based and portable ration distribution in states such as Telangana, have shown promise in improving transparency and reducing corruption. However, this digital shift presupposes universal access to banking and internet services, which remains uneven, especially in rural and tribal areas. Consequently, many vulnerable populations risk being excluded, highlighting the digital divide as a critical barrier. This underscores the paradox of technological interventions: while they can enhance efficiency, they may inadvertently exacerbate inequalities if not inclusively designed.
In addition to these supply-side measures, nutrition-focused programs like the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and the Mid-Day Meal Scheme address the demand side by targeting malnutrition among children and women. These schemes have contributed to improving child health indicators in many states, including Telangana. Yet, challenges persist in terms of quality, coverage, and monitoring. For instance, the Global Hunger Index 2023 still ranks India in the ‘serious’ hunger category, reflecting gaps in translating policy intent into ground realities. The persistence of hidden hunger, micronutrient deficiencies, calls for a more holistic approach that integrates food security with health, sanitation, and education.
Furthermore, the government’s response to climate change and its impact on food security is emerging as a critical dimension. Erratic monsoons, rising temperatures, and extreme weather events threaten agricultural stability. Initiatives like the National Adaptation Fund for Climate Change (NAFCC) and promotion of climate-resilient crops are steps in the right direction. However, these measures remain nascent and underfunded relative to the scale of the problem. The intersection of environmental sustainability and food security demands urgent policy coherence, as underscored by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Internationally, India’s food security policies resonate with global frameworks but also reflect unique challenges of scale and diversity. The country’s commitment to the Zero Hunger goal by 2030 aligns with its domestic efforts, yet the pace of progress is uneven. Lessons from countries like Brazil’s Bolsa Família, which combines cash transfers with nutrition education, suggest that multidimensional strategies may yield better outcomes. India’s own experience with the Public Distribution System offers valuable insights but also signals the need for reform towards more targeted, transparent, and nutrition-sensitive interventions.
In conclusion, the Indian government’s measures for improving food security constitute a multifaceted endeavor marked by significant achievements and persistent challenges. While schemes like the NFSA and PDS have expanded access, issues of efficiency, inclusivity, and nutrition remain. Agricultural productivity enhancements must be balanced with sustainability and farmer welfare, and technological reforms need to bridge the digital divide. Addressing malnutrition requires integrated approaches that transcend mere calorie sufficiency. As India strides towards its food security goals, embracing a holistic, inclusive, and adaptive policy framework is imperative. After all, as the ancient wisdom in the Bhagavad Gita reminds us, _“You have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work”_, a call to focus not just on production but on equitable and sustainable nourishment for all.
This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.
Practise this question
1Get the answer sheet
Sized for this question.
2Write your answer
Timed, by hand.
3Get it marked
Your score and what to fix.
This chapter in the exam
Issues of economic growth and justice6 questions
Asked in 2 of 2 sittings since 2016
Most tested: Economic inequality and regional disparity under development policy
- 2024Is economic development a panacea for overcoming social inequality? Comment.
- 2024'The uneven development has led to the growth of regionalism in India.' Discuss.
All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.
Question from the official TGPSC Group-I Mains 2016 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.