Critically examine the implementation of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments. How far is it effective?

Question

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

The 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992) gave Panchayats and Municipalities constitutional status, regular elections, one-third reservation for women and State Finance Commissions, deepening grassroots democracy. Their effectiveness is only partial, as states devolved few of the 29 Eleventh Schedule subjects, funds and functionaries, and Hyderabad's Metropolitan Planning Committee rarely functions.

**Introduction**

The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments of 1992 empowered Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) to decentralise governance and deepen democracy, with states like ==Telangana== reflecting varied implementation outcomes.

**Implementation of the 73rd Amendment**

1. **Constitutional Entrenchment of Panchayats**: The 73rd Amendment added Part IX, mandating a three-tier Panchayati Raj system, regular elections, reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and women, and the establishment of State Election and Finance Commissions, institutionalising rural governance including in ==Telangana==.

2. **Partial Devolution of Powers**: Despite the 11th Schedule listing 29 subjects, many states, including ==Telangana==, have been slow in devolving adequate financial and administrative powers, limiting Panchayat autonomy.

**Implementation of the 74th Amendment**

1. **Constitutional Status for Urban Local Bodies**: The 74th Amendment introduced Part IX-A, granting constitutional recognition to Municipalities, mandating elections, reservations, and Metropolitan Planning Committees, formalising urban governance in Hyderabad.

2. **Inadequate Functional Devolution and Planning**: Urban Local Bodies remain dependent on state governments for funds and approvals; Metropolitan Planning Committees are often ineffective, causing fragmented urban governance.

**Effectiveness of the Amendments**

1. **Democratic Deepening and Inclusion**: Both amendments enhanced political participation of women and marginalized groups, with ==Telangana== showing gains in grassroots accountability through schemes like Mission Bhagiratha.

2. **Limited Fiscal and Administrative Autonomy**: Inadequate devolution of funds and functions constrains local bodies’ capacity to implement development projects independently.

3. **State-Level Variability**: Success depends on political will; ==Telangana== has made progress post-statehood but challenges in decentralisation persist.

**Conclusion**

While the 73rd and 74th Amendments⟦1⟧ institutionalised local democracy and inclusion, their effectiveness is limited by incomplete devolution and uneven state implementation.

73వ మరియు 74వ రాజ్యాంగ సవరణల అమలును విమర్శనాత్మకంగా పరిశీలించండి. ఇది ఎంతవరకు ప్రభావవంతంగా ఉంది?

Model answer

ఈ ప్రశ్నను ప్రాక్టీస్ చేయండి

ఫెడరలిజం, కేంద్ర-రాష్ట్ర సంబంధాలు, స్థానిక ప్రభుత్వం, అంతర్-రాష్ట్ర వివాదాలు4 questions

Ghissu