2024 · Paper IV · 10 marks

Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the Paris Agreement on climate change. How effective is Paris Agreement in addressing global warming?

In short

The Paris Agreement (2015) brought all countries into a bottom-up framework of Nationally Determined Contributions, but its targets are non-binding, climate finance is unreliable and enforcement weak, so it is only partly effective. Global emissions keep rising, and 2024 was the hottest year on record at 1.55°C above pre-industrial levels.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Paris Agreement1 is a landmark global effort to limit warming to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, by uniting all nations under a framework balancing environmental, social, and economic goals. Adopted in 2015 under the UNFCCC, it represents the first universal climate accord involving both developed and developing countries, emphasizing shared but differentiated responsibilities.
Strengths of the Paris Agreement
•

Bottom-Up NDCs and National Ownership

Countries set emission targets every five years; India pledged a 33-35% reduction in emissions intensity from 2005 levels, raised to 45% in 2022, supported by Telangana’s renewable energy projects, enhancing flexibility and ambition. This approach encourages countries to tailor actions to their contexts, increasing engagement and accountability.

Weaknesses of the Paris Agreement
•

Insufficient Climate Finance2 and Delayed Adaptation Funding

Despite pledges of $100 billion annually, funding is inconsistent; COP30 delayed tripling adaptation finance to 2035, weakening support for vulnerable areas like Telangana’s agricultural sectors dependent on Mission Kakatiya. This shortfall hampers developing countries’ capacity to adapt and transition to low-carbon economies.

Effectiveness in Addressing Global Warming
•

Global Cooperation and Ambition Platform

The Agreement fosters dialogue and progressive commitments; India’s leadership and the global solar alliance show positive momentum. It also enables technology transfer and capacity building, crucial for sustainable development.

•

Ambition Gap and Slow Progress

Many NDCs fall short of 1.5°C targets and updated 2035 NDCs came late, limiting effectiveness. The lack of centralized enforcement and transparency mechanisms allows “climate cheating,” slowing global emission reductions.

Conclusion
The Paris Agreement’s inclusive framework and flexibility promote cooperation and national ownership, but non-binding targets, finance shortfalls, and enforcement gaps hinder its full potential to curb global warming effectively. Strengthening ambition and support mechanisms remains essential for its success.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Paris Agreement Strengths vs Weaknesses. Paris Agreement Strengths vs Weaknesses. Comparison of Strengths and Weaknesses
Diagram: Paris Agreement Strengths vs Weaknesses

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Global environmental issues: climate change, sustainable development2 questions

Asked in 1 of 2 sittings since 2016

2016
–
2024
2

Most tested: Effectiveness of international climate treaties, especially Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement.

Question from the official TGPSC Group-I Mains 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·