2014 · GS Paper 4 · Q13 · 20 marks

Rameshwar successfully cleared the prestigious civil services examination and was excited about the opportunity that he would get through the civil services to serve the country. However, soon after joining the services, he realized that things are not as rosy as he had imagined. He found a number of malpractices prevailing in the department assigned to him. For example, funds under various schemes and grants were being misappropriated. The official facilities were frequently being used for personal needs by the officers and staff. After some time, he noticed that the process of recruiting the staff was also not up to the mark. Prospective candidates were required to write an examination in which a lot of cheating was going on. Some candidates were provided external help in the examination. Rameshwar brought these incidents to the notice of his seniors. However, he was advised to keep his eyes, ears and mouth shut and ignore all these things which were taking place with the connivance of the higher-ups. Rameshwar felt highly disillusioned and uncomfortable. He comes to you seeking your advice. Indicate various options that you think are available in this situation. How would you help him to evaluate these options and choose the most appropriate path to be adopted?

In short

Rameshwar should neither stay silent nor quit, but gather evidence, report the malpractices in writing up the chain and approach the Central Vigilance Commission if ignored. The 2004 whistle-blower resolution, born after Satyendra Dubey's murder, protects such lawful disclosure.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Rameshwar's case tests whether a young officer's idealism survives a culture of silence. The core dilemma is between Organisational Loyalty and Public Accountability to citizens and honest candidates.
(a) Options Available to Rameshwar
He faces three wrongs: misappropriation of funds, misuse of facilities and a rigged recruitment examination. He can stay silent, seek a transfer, clean only his own desk, go public at once, or document and escalate.
(b) Helping Him Evaluate the Options
I would test each option on legality, public interest, cost to stakeholders and the publicity test.
•

(i) CAPITULATE [Compromised-Hybrid]

Silence protects his career but is Bystander Apathy and complicity.

•

(ii) EVADE [Procedural-Evasive]

A transfer brings peace but is Moral Escapism; the fraud continues.

•

(iii) COMPROMISE [Empathetic-Humanitarian]

Clean conduct alone leaves candidates cheated through Diffusion of Responsibility.

•

(iv) CONFRONT [Strict-Legal]

Going to the media breaches the Conduct Rules and alerts the culprits.

•

(v) RECONCILE ✓ [Balanced]

Document and escalate through lawful channels (recommended).

(c) The Most Appropriate Path
•

Record and report

Gather evidence and report in writing to the Head of Department, as T.S.R. Subramanian (2013) [case] favoured recorded over oral instructions.

•

Protected channel

If ignored, approach the CVC under the 2004 whistle-blower resolution born after Satyendra Dubey's [officer] murder.

•

Clean recruitment

Seek CCTV and outside invigilators, citing the Public Examinations Act, 2024 [current event].

Justification:
Kant's Categorical Imperative: silence on command cannot be universalised without destroying honest institutions.
Conclusion
Rameshwar should stay, document and escalate, so that his integrity becomes the department's architecture rather than his private burden.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Organisational Loyalty vs Public Accountability. Organisational Loyalty vs Public Accountability. Venn diagram: Organisational Loyalty, Public Accountability; overlap: Documented escalation within law
Diagram: Organisational Loyalty vs Public Accountability

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Integrity Under Pressure7 questions

Asked in 6 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
2
2014
1
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
–
2020
1
2021
–
2022
1
2023
–
2024
–
2025
1
2026
–

All 7 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2014 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·