2015 · GS Paper 4 · Q5(b) · 5 marks

Two different kinds of attitudes exhibited by public servants towards their work have been identified as the bureaucratic attitude and the democratic attitude. Is it possible to balance the two to create a better administration for the faster development of our country?

In short

The bureaucratic and democratic attitudes can be balanced, because rules give fairness and accountability while participation gives local knowledge and legitimacy. MGNREGA's Section 17 shows the fusion, making social audit by the gram sabha a legal duty.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The bureaucratic attitude, rooted in Weber's legal-rational authority, values rules, hierarchy and impartiality; the democratic attitude values participation and responsiveness. They look opposed, yet balancing them is both possible and exactly what faster, fairer development needs.
Why Balancing the Two Attitudes Is Possible
•

Complementary strengths

Rules give predictability, equal treatment and accountability, while participation gives local knowledge, ownership and legitimacy, each covering the other's blind spot.

•

Constitutional mandate

Article 14 demands non-arbitrary action, while the 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992) built participation into local government; MGNREGA's Section 17 even makes social audit a legal duty.

How the Balance Speeds Up Development
•

Firm process, open voice

EIA public hearings under the 2006 Notification let affected people be heard within a time-bound process, cutting later litigation.

•

Rigour with convergence

The Aspirational Districts Programme (2018) pairs ranked monthly indicators with collaboration among officials and citizens.

•

From rule to role

Mission Karmayogi (2020) aims to move officers from rule-based to role-based functioning, pairing procedural competence with courteous, citizen-facing behaviour at every level of service.

•

Citizen-centric design

The Second ARC's report on Citizen Centric Administration (2009) recommended citizens' charters and grievance redress within clear standards, as in the Sevottam model.

Conclusion
Yes, the two can and should be balanced: rules as the floor that guarantees fairness and accountability, democratic responsiveness as the compass that gives direction. An administration firm in procedure yet open in spirit delivers development that is faster and owned by the people.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Bureaucratic vs Democratic. Bureaucratic vs Democratic. Comparison of Bureaucratic and Democratic
Diagram: Bureaucratic vs Democratic

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Attitude — Content, structure, function4 questions

Asked in 3 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
1
2015
2
2016
–
2017
–
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
1
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
–
2026
–

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2015 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·