Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive…

Question

Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence.

Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Law controls conduct through external, state-made commands enforced by punishment, while ethics works through conscience, motive and social censure and asks for an ideal beyond the legal minimum. Gandhi's Salt Satyagraha (1930) was illegal yet ethical, while exploiting tax loopholes is legal yet unethical.

**Introduction**

Law and ethics serve one end, orderly social life, but by different roads: law commands from outside and punishes, ethics persuades from within through conscience.

**Differences in Source, Sanction and Scope**

1. **Source**: Law is made by Parliament, delegated rule-makers and courts; ethics springs from conscience, philosophy and custom and needs no enactment.
2. **Sanction**: A bribe brings prison under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, while an ethical lapse brings guilt or social censure.
3. **Act versus intention**: Law judges proven acts, ethics weighs motive; for Kant, an official honest only out of fear of audit is lawful but not yet moral.
4. **Fixed versus evolving**: Casino gambling is licensed in Goa but barred in most states, and Section 377 changed only with Navtej Singh Johar (2018); ethics claims universal reach.

**Where the Two Approaches Diverge in Practice**

SKETCH: matrix | Law and Ethics Grid
cols: Legal | Illegal
rows: Ethical | Unethical
tl: Honest tax filing
tr: Salt Satyagraha 1930
bl: Exploiting tax loopholes
br: Taking a bribe

1. **Minimum versus ideal**: No law compels a passer-by to help an accident victim; ethics does, and law could only shield Good Samaritans through Section 134A of the Motor Vehicles Act in 2019.
2. **Command versus aspiration**: The Senior Citizens Act, 2007 can compel maintenance of parents, but not the care that filial duty asks.
3. **Reading the gaps**: Gandhi broke an unjust salt law for a higher justice, while aggressive tax avoidance stays legal yet erodes fairness.

**Conclusion**

Law secures order through coercion and a common minimum; ethics secures goodness through conviction. A public servant must treat legality as the floor and conscience as the measure.

Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence. Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.

Model answer

Practise this question

Laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance16 questions

Ghissu