2017 · GS Paper 3 · Q2 · 10 marks

Account for the failure of manufacturing sector in achieving the goal of labour-intensive exports. Suggest measures for more labour-intensive rather than capital-intensive exports.

In short

Labour-intensive exports failed because rigid labour laws, small-scale reservation, inverted duties on man-made fibre and weaker market access kept Indian apparel and leather firms small and uncompetitive. Fixed-term employment, the Labour Codes, PM MITRA parks, GST 2.0 and the India-UK trade agreement address these gaps.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Despite abundant low-skilled labour, India's exports lean on capital-intensive goods such as refined petroleum, engineering goods and pharmaceuticals. The Economic Survey 2016-17 chapter "Clothes and Shoes" showed apparel and leather, the most job-rich sectors, losing ground to Bangladesh and Vietnam.
Why Labour-Intensive Exports Failed
•

Rigid labour laws

Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 required permission to lay off workers in units of 100 or more, so firms chose machines or stayed small.

•

Missing middle

Decades of small-scale reservation for garments and footwear left firms too small to fill large global orders.

•

Distorted costs and access

Inverted duties made man-made fibre costlier than cotton, while Bangladesh enjoys duty-free EU entry that Indian apparel lacks.

Measures for Labour-Intensive Exports
•

Flexibility with security

Fixed-term employment and the Labour Codes, in force since November 2025, raise the lay-off threshold to 300 workers and widen social security.

•

Scale through clusters

PM MITRA parks, PLI for man-made fibre textiles and the Budget 2025-26 footwear and leather scheme build scale.

•

Market access

The India-UK trade agreement (July 2025) will give duty-free access for textiles and leather.

•

Costs and skills

GST 2.0 (September 2025) corrected the fibre inverted duty, and the Samarth scheme skills textile workers.

Conclusion
The failure lay in policies that priced labour high and kept firms small. Correcting them can create the non-farm jobs India needs every year and make exports a route to decent work under SDG 8.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: How Labour Got Priced Out. How Labour Got Priced Out. Flow: Rigid labour rules → Small, fragmented firms → No scale economies → Lost global orders
Diagram: How Labour Got Priced Out

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Industrial Growth4 questions

Asked in 3 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
2
2018
–
2019
–
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
1
2024
–
2025
–
2026
1

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2017 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·