2019 · GS Paper 4 · Q4(b) · 10 marks

There is a view that the Official Secrets Act is an obstacle to the implementation of Right to Information Act. Do you agree with the view? Discuss.

In short

The Official Secrets Act obstructs RTI in practice through its undefined notion of secrecy and the culture of withholding it sustains, but in law the RTI Act prevails through Sections 22 and 8(2). The Second ARC (2006) recommended repealing OSA and moving genuine secrets into the National Security Act.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The Official Secrets Act, 1923, a colonial law, treats official information as the State's property, while the RTI Act, 2005 treats it as the citizen's right. Whether one obstructs the other depends on what the statutes say and how officers behave.
Why OSA Is Seen as an Obstacle
•

Undefined "secret"

Section 5 punishes communication of official information without defining secrecy, so almost any file can be withheld.

•

Culture of secrecy

With Rule 11 of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964, it trains officers to withhold first, making Public Information Officers wary of disclosure.

•

Chilling effect

The case against journalist Iftikhar Gilani (2002), dropped because the material was public, and OSA threats over the Rafale papers (2019) deter the press and whistleblowers.

•

Expert verdict

The Second ARC (2006) recommended repealing OSA and moving genuine secrets into the National Security Act.

Why the Legal Conflict Is Narrower
•

Overriding clause

Section 22 gives RTI effect notwithstanding OSA, and Section 8(2) permits disclosure when public interest outweighs harm.

•

Courts side with RTI

In Yashwant Sinha v CBI (2019) the Supreme Court relied on these provisions to admit the Rafale documents.

•

Security protected

Section 8(1)(a) and Section 24 shield security, yet keep allegations of corruption and human rights violations open.

Conclusion
I agree only in part: in law RTI prevails, but OSA's secrecy mindset still blocks disclosure in practice. A narrow, defined secrecy law, as the Second ARC urged, would complete the shift to constitutional transparency.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: OSA 1923 and RTI 2005. OSA 1923 and RTI 2005. Comparison of OSA 1923 and RTI 2005
Diagram: OSA 1923 and RTI 2005

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Information sharing and transparency in government; Right to Information4 questions

Asked in 4 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
1
2016
–
2017
1
2018
1
2019
1
2020
–
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
–
2026
–

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2019 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·