2020 · GS Paper 1 · Q3 · 10 marks

Evaluate the policies of Lord Curzon and their long term implications on the national movements.

In short

Curzon's efficiency-driven but centralising policies, above all the 1905 partition of Bengal, backfired by radicalising Indian nationalism. The Swadeshi movement, the Surat split, revolutionary groups and the Muslim League's founding in 1906 followed, though his Ancient Monuments Preservation Act (1904) was a lasting gain.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Lord Curzon (1899-1905) sought to make British rule efficient and permanent, yet, as Sumit Sarkar shows, his tenure radicalised Indian nationalism more than any other. His record must be judged on both administrative and political scales.
Curzon's Policies: Efficiency with an Imperial Edge
•

Curbs on self-government

The Calcutta Corporation Act (1899) cut elected members and the Official Secrets Act (1904) restricted the press.

•

Control of universities

The Indian Universities Act (1904), after the Raleigh Commission, tightened official control and alienated the educated middle class.

•

Partition of Bengal

Effected in October 1905, it was seen by Risley as a way to divide a united, politically conscious Bengal.

•

Constructive reforms

The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act (1904), the Pusa research institute and the Police Commission (1902) were lasting gains.

Long-term Implications for the National Movement
•

Swadeshi as rehearsal

Boycott, national education and swadeshi enterprise became techniques Gandhi later scaled up.

•

Extremism and revolution

The swaraj goal (1906), the Surat split (1907) and groups such as the Anushilan Samiti followed as Tilak and Aurobindo gained ground.

•

Communal politics

The Muslim League (Dacca, 1906) and separate electorates (1909) seeded religious politics that ran on to 1947.

•

Confidence of victory

The annulment of 1911 showed that agitation could reverse imperial decisions.

Conclusion
Curzon succeeded as an administrator but failed as a strategist; Gokhale likened his rule to Aurangzeb's. A viceroy who sought to secure the Raj became the unwitting catalyst of mass nationalism and of the communal divide.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Curzon's Intent vs Outcome. Curzon's Intent vs Outcome. Comparison of Intent and Outcome
Diagram: Curzon's Intent vs Outcome

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Role of Masses and Personalities13 questions

Asked in 8 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
4
2014
–
2015
2
2016
2
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2021
1
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
–
2026
1

All 13 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2020 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·