2020 · GS Paper 2 · Q5 · 10 marks

Once a speaker, Always a speaker! Do you think the practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India.

In short

The Westminster convention of a party-free Speaker would make the Lok Sabha chair more objective, but only if paired with a bar on later office and an independent defection tribunal. Former Speakers such as Shivraj Patil later becoming Union ministers shows why such safeguards matter.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
In Britain the Speaker quits the party and contests later polls as "the Speaker seeking re-election". India's Speaker, chosen under Article 93, keeps party ties, which raises the question whether importing the convention would make the chair more objective.
Merits and Limits of the Westminster Convention
•

Removes the re-nomination incentive

Freed from the party ticket, a Speaker could certify Money Bills under Article 110(3) and decide defection petitions without fear, a concern raised by the Aadhaar Act's certification in 2016.

•

Indian precedents

N. Sanjiva Reddy left the Congress on becoming Speaker in 1967, and Somnath Chatterjee accepted expulsion from the CPI(M) in 2008 rather than vacate the chair before a trust vote.

•

Practical hurdles

Parties may still contest the seat, constituents lose an active MP, and Speakers like Shivraj Patil later became ministers.

Implications for Parliamentary Business
•

Opposition trust

A neutral chair would defuse walkouts over adjournment and suspension decisions.

•

Credible adjudication

Defection rulings, delayed so often that the Supreme Court set a three-month norm in 2020, would gain legitimacy.

•

Institutional memory

A long-serving Speaker masters procedure and committee management.

•

Risk of entrenchment

A Speaker without electoral accountability could grow complacent, and conventions cannot bind unwilling parties.

Conclusion
On balance the practice deserves adoption with Indian safeguards: a bar on later political office, a cross-party pact not to contest the Speaker's seat, and an independent defection tribunal. These would make the chair objective in fact and strengthen parliamentary business.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Speaker in UK and India. Speaker in UK and India. Comparison of UK Speaker and Indian Speaker
Diagram: Speaker in UK and India

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Parliament — Structure3 questions

Asked in 2 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
–
2019
–
2020
2
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
–
2026
1

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2020 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·