2024 · GS Paper 2 · Q18 · 15 marks

e-governance is not just about the routine application of digital technology in service delivery process. It is as much about multifarious interactions for ensuring transparency and accountability. In this context evaluate the role of the Interactive Service Model of e-governance.

In short

The Interactive Service Model advances transparency and accountability by making e-governance a two-way loop in which citizens raise requests, track action and rate officials. CPGRAMS, Rajasthan's Jan Soochna Portal and Odisha's Mo Sarkar prove its role, though access gaps and tokenistic consultation keep it partial.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The 2nd ARC (2008) framed e-governance as SMART governance, and its accountable and transparent parts need two-way exchange, not mere automation. The Interactive Service Model supplies this by bringing citizens into direct, continuous interaction with government.
Interactive Model's Role in Transparency and Accountability
•

Grievance redress

CPGRAMS lets citizens lodge, track and rate complaints against any central ministry, fixing responsibility on a named officer.

•

Proactive disclosure

Rajasthan's Jan Soochna Portal (2019) publishes beneficiary data under Section 4 of the RTI Act so villagers can verify their own entitlements.

•

Feedback on officials

Odisha's Mo Sarkar (2019) collects citizen ratings of police and hospital staff, and cVIGIL (2018) tracks poll-code complaints to closure.

•

Participation

MyGov (2014) crowdsources ideas, opening policy choices to public view.

Where the Interactive Model Falls Short
•

Disposal without resolution

Template replies close many grievances, which forced CPGRAMS to add citizen feedback and appeals.

•

Access gap

Women are 30% less likely than men to use mobile internet (GSMA, 2024).

•

Tokenistic consultation

The Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (2014) is not binding, and the 2020 farm laws began as ordinances with no public draft.

Way Forward
•

Closure on satisfaction

Treat grievances as resolved only after citizen confirmation, as Sevottam implies.

•

Assisted access

Use Common Service Centres and Bhashini for vernacular, voice-based interaction.

Conclusion
The Interactive Service Model most directly serves transparency and accountability by making the state answerable in real time. Its role is substantial but partial; inclusive access and feedback that changes decisions will realise SDG 16.7.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Interactive Service Loop. Interactive Service Loop. Flow: Citizen raises request → Routed to officer → Time-bound action → Public status tracking → Citizen feedback → (back to start)
Diagram: Interactive Service Loop

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

e-Governance — Applications, Models, Successes, Limitations and Potential6 questions

Asked in 6 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2021
–
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
1
2026
–

All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·