2025 · GS Paper 2 · Q7 · 10 marks

e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.

In short

Many Indian e-governance projects do favour technology and back-end integration over user-centric design, a pattern Richard Heeks called the design-reality gap. GST Network and income-tax portal glitches and CoWIN's initial online-only registration show the bias, while DigiLocker, Bhashini and NeSDA show it is correctable.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Richard Heeks (2003) estimated that about 35% of e-government projects in developing countries fail outright and 50% partly, mostly due to a "design-reality gap". Many Indian projects show the same tilt: they are built around technology and back-end integration rather than the citizen at the counter.
Evidence of a Technology-First Bias
•

Launch before usability

The GST Network's 2017 glitches forced the suspension of planned return forms, and the 2021 income-tax portal faltered so badly that the Finance Minister summoned Infosys.

•

Assumed access

CoWIN first required online registration for 18-44 year olds (May 2021), excluding many rural and less digitally literate citizens until walk-in registration was allowed.

•

Rigid authentication

The NMMS app's geotagged attendance for MGNREGA (2023) and PDS biometrics in Jharkhand shifted connectivity failures onto the poorest users.

•

Unreformed processes

Forms are digitised without re-engineering, so citizens still upload documents the state already holds, as the 2nd ARC (2008) warned.

Signs of a Shift Towards Users
•

Useful integration

DigiLocker, with 53.92 crore users (PIB, 2025), shows that back-end integration can itself spare citizens paperwork.

•

Inclusion features

Bhashini's AI translation and Common Service Centres widen reach beyond smartphone owners.

•

Measuring the citizen

DARPG's NeSDA rates portals on accessibility, ease of use and end-service delivery, not merely on whether they exist.

•

Proven redesigns

Passport Seva rebuilt the application journey around the applicant.

Conclusion
The technology bias is real and hurts the poorest most, but better platforms show it is a design choice, not an inherent trait. Designing around the citizen journey, as the 2nd ARC's SMART vision demands, will make e-governance truly citizen-centric.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Tech-First vs User-Centric. Tech-First vs User-Centric. Comparison of Tech-first design and User-centric design
Diagram: Tech-First vs User-Centric

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

e-Governance — Applications, Models, Successes, Limitations and Potential6 questions

Asked in 6 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
–
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2021
–
2022
–
2023
1
2024
1
2025
1
2026
–

All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·