"Mindless addiction to Form, ignoring the Substance of the matter, results in rendering of injustice. A…

Question

"Mindless addiction to Form, ignoring the Substance of the matter, results in rendering of injustice. A perceptive civil servant is one who ignores such literalness and carries out true intent." Examine the above statement with suitable illustrations.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Mindless formalism denies justice, as when Santoshi Kumari died in Jharkhand in 2017 after her ration card was cancelled for want of Aadhaar seeding. A perceptive civil servant reads rules by their purpose, using lawful discretion and recorded reasons rather than ignoring the law.

**Introduction**

Robert Merton called it **goal displacement**: the rule becomes the goal and the citizen is forgotten. The statement asks the civil servant to serve the purpose for which a rule exists.

**How Mindless Formalism Renders Injustice**

1. **Ration denied for a link**: In 2017, eleven-year-old Santoshi Kumari of Simdega, Jharkhand, died after her family's ration card was cancelled for not being seeded with Aadhaar.
2. **Treatment held up by paperwork**: In Parmanand Katara (1989) the Supreme Court held that doctors must treat accident victims without waiting for police formalities.
3. **Procedure as master**: The Court calls procedure "the handmaid of justice", as in State of Punjab v. Shamlal Murari (1976), refusing to let technical defects defeat genuine claims.

**Carrying Out True Intent, Within Limits**

SKETCH: spectrum | Where the Perceptive Officer Stands
left: Mindless literalism
right: Arbitrary discretion
- Rule-bound clerk
- Purposive civil servant
- Unchecked whim

1. **Purposive reading**: After the Jharkhand deaths, the Centre directed in 2017 that no one be denied ration merely for lack of Aadhaar, reading the rule by its purpose.
2. **Lawful discretion**: Relaxation clauses and Gandhi's talisman let an officer reach the last person without breaking the rule book.
3. **Some forms protect rights**: The arrest safeguards of D.K. Basu (1997) carry substance, so ignoring them would itself be injustice.
4. **Guarding against arbitrariness**: E.P. Royappa (1974) held arbitrariness antithetical to equality, so intent must be shown in recorded reasons.

**Conclusion**

The statement is largely valid: form detached from purpose turns administration against the citizen. Perceptiveness lies not in ignoring the law but in reading it by its purpose and recording why, so justice is delivered without sacrificing the rule of law.

"Mindless addiction to Form, ignoring the Substance of the matter, results in rendering of injustice. A perceptive civil servant is one who ignores such literalness and carries out true intent." Examine the above statement with suitable illustrations.

Model answer

Practise this question

Laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance16 questions

Ghissu