2025 · GS Paper 3 · Q11 · 15 marks

Explain how the Fiscal Health Index (FHI) can be used as a tool for assessing the fiscal performance of states in India. In what way would it encourage the states to adopt prudent and sustainable fiscal policies ?

In short

NITI Aayog's Fiscal Health Index assesses 18 major states on expenditure quality, revenue mobilisation, fiscal prudence, debt and debt sustainability, and its public ranking spurs prudence through peer pressure and market scrutiny. In the 2025 edition Odisha led with a score of 67.8 while Punjab ranked last.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
States account for about two-thirds of government spending but raise only one-third of revenue (NITI Aayog, 2025). NITI Aayog's Fiscal Health Index, launched in January 2025 for 18 major states, gives a common yardstick for their fiscal performance.
FHI as a Tool for Assessing State Finances
•

Five sub-indices

Quality of Expenditure, Revenue Mobilisation, Fiscal Prudence, Debt Index and Debt Sustainability together prevent a state from hiding weak capital spending behind a low deficit.

•

Benchmarking

Odisha led with 67.8 while Punjab ranked last, and capital outlay ranged from about 27% of development spending in Madhya Pradesh to about 10% in West Bengal.

•

Early warning

Tracking debt and interest burdens against GSDP and revenue flags states drifting towards unsustainable borrowing.

How FHI Encourages Prudent and Sustainable Policies
•

Competitive federalism

Public ranking creates the peer pressure that the Ease of Doing Business rankings created, nudging laggards to copy leaders.

•

Cheaper borrowing

With market loans above half of state liabilities by 2019, a better profile can lower borrowing costs.

•

Revenue effort

Odisha and Jharkhand raising about 21% of revenue from non-tax sources shows others what is possible.

•

Discipline on freebies

A visible fall in prudence scores raises the political cost of untargeted subsidies.

Way Forward
•

Incentives and coverage

Link scores to Finance Commission performance grants and include off-budget borrowings and guarantees so scores reflect true debt.

Conclusion
The FHI makes fiscal health measurable and comparable. Tied to incentives, it can make prudent, capital-focused budgeting a competitive advantage for states.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: FHI as a Reform Loop. FHI as a Reform Loop. Flow: Transparent ranking → Peer pressure → Market and voter scrutiny → Policy correction → Better score → (back to start)
Diagram: FHI as a Reform Loop

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Fiscal Federalism4 questions

Asked in 4 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
–
2019
1
2020
1
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
–
2025
1
2026
–

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·