2026 · GS Paper 3 · Q7 · 10 marks

Discuss how the contradiction between 'rapid infrastructure development' and 'disaster-risk reduction' in ecologically-sensitive areas of India can be managed, with suitable examples. (Answer in 150 words)

In short

The contradiction between rapid infrastructure and disaster-risk reduction in fragile regions is managed through carrying-capacity zoning, hazard-mapped alignments, resilient design and continuous monitoring. Joshimath's subsidence and the Silkyara tunnel collapse in 2023 show the cost of building without risk screening.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Joshimath's subsidence (2023) and the Silkyara tunnel collapse (2023) show how roads, tunnels and dams can multiply hazards in the Himalaya and Western Ghats. The contradiction is managed by making development risk-informed, not by halting it.
Planning Before Building
•

Carrying-capacity zoning

Eco-sensitive zones on the lines of the Kasturirangan report (2013), with cumulative impact studies, should cap what each valley can bear.

•

Hazard-mapped alignment

Roads and hydro projects should follow GSI landslide-susceptibility maps, avoiding the slope-cutting that destabilised Char Dham hillsides.

Resilient Building and Oversight
•

Resilient design

Slope bioengineering, drainage and tunnel escape passages, absent at Silkyara, should be standard, as the India-led CDRI urges.

•

Monitoring and oversight

Early warning on high-risk glacial lakes, needed after the South Lhonak flood destroyed the Teesta-III dam (2023), and community consent keep projects accountable.

Conclusion
Development in fragile landscapes becomes sustainable only when every project is screened, built and monitored for disaster risk, in line with the Sendai Framework.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Reconciling the Contradiction. Reconciling the Contradiction. Venn diagram: Infrastructure growth, Disaster-risk reduction; overlap: Risk-informed development
Diagram: Reconciling the Contradiction
Hand-drawn diagram: How Projects Multiply Hazards. How Projects Multiply Hazards. Diagram (fishbone): How Projects Multiply Hazards; Disaster in fragile terrain; Slope-cutting for roads; Poor drainage; No tunnel escape passages; Unmonitored glacial lakes; Project-by-project clearance
Diagram: How Projects Multiply Hazards

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Disaster Risk Reduction & Mitigation6 questions

Asked in 6 of 14 sittings since 2013

2013
1
2014
–
2015
–
2016
–
2017
–
2018
1
2019
1
2020
1
2021
–
2022
–
2023
–
2024
1
2025
–
2026
1

All 6 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official UPSC Civil Services (Main) Examination 2026 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·