On the request of his Personal Assistant (PA), the District Magistrate (DM) stops the transfer of a…

Question

On the request of his Personal Assistant (PA), the District Magistrate (DM) stops the transfer of a schoolteacher who takes private tuition for his daughter diagnosed with learning disability. In this context, discuss the aspects of empathy versus compliance with rules.

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

The DM's empathy is genuine but partial, since it favours his own PA's family and protects a teacher whose private tuition breaches Section 28 of the RTE Act, 2009. The transfer should proceed, with the child supported through Samagra Shiksha's special educators.

**Introduction**

This case turns on the conflict between compassion for a vulnerable child and the impartial application of rules. The DM's empathy is directed at his own PA's family and shields a teacher whose private tuition is itself questionable.

**Aspects of Empathy in the Decision**

1. **A genuine need**: Specific learning disability is among the 21 disabilities under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and a familiar tutor matters to such a child.
2. **Rules are not ends**: Empathy reveals the human cost behind a file, the spirit of Gandhi's talisman.
3. **Empathy as a spotlight**: Paul Bloom's *Against Empathy* (2016) warns that empathy favours those close to us; acting on a PA's request becomes a **conflict of interest** dressed as kindness.

**Aspects of Compliance with Rules**

SKETCH: venn | Reconciling the DM's Choice
a: Empathy for the child
b: Rule-bound transfer
overlap: Transfer upheld, child supported

1. **The ground is irregular**: Section 28 of the Right to Education Act, 2009 bars teachers from private tuition, so retention rewards a violation.
2. **Equality and integrity**: Article 14 and the All India Services (Conduct) Rules require impartial decisions taken solely in the public interest; other teachers with equal hardship had no access to the DM.
3. **Institutional remedy**: Special educators under Samagra Shiksha's inclusive education component can meet the child's need lawfully.

**Conclusion**

Empathy that bends rules for the officer's own circle is partiality, not compassion, so the transfer should proceed and any hardship plea go through the regular committee. The DM can serve empathy rightly by securing institutional support for the child.

On the request of his Personal Assistant (PA), the District Magistrate (DM) stops the transfer of a schoolteacher who takes private tuition for his daughter diagnosed with learning disability. In this context, discuss the aspects of empathy versus compliance with rules.

Model answer

Practise this question

Laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance16 questions

Ghissu