Critically evaluate the central administration under Akbar.

Question

Ghissu Editorial · Accepted Answer

Akbar's central administration was efficient and innovative, dividing power among finance, military, judiciary and household departments, introducing the dahsala revenue system and institutionalising the mansabdari hierarchy. Critically, it also intensified revenue extraction from peasants, suffered corruption in posts like the chief qazi, and reduced local autonomy.

**Introduction**

Akbar’s central administration was transformative, blending Timurid legacy with reforms to enhance governance, though it faced socio-economic and administrative challenges.

**Structural Innovations**

1. **Division of Authority**: Akbar replaced the wazir system with four departments (finance, military, judiciary, royal household), creating checks and balances and preventing power concentration.

2. **Revenue Administration**: The dahsala system fixed land revenue based on a ten-year average of crop yields and prices, stabilizing state income and reducing arbitrary assessments.

3. **Mansabdari System**: Institutionalized a graded military and bureaucratic hierarchy linking rank, salary, and jagir, professionalizing nobility and ensuring loyalty.

4. **Intelligence and Records**: The mir bakhshi managed intelligence and nobility, while court writers recorded imperial orders, aiding centralized control.

**Limitations and Challenges**

1. **Economic Exploitation**: Raychaudhuri notes peasants paid higher dues due to centralized price fixing and jagir exploitation, prioritizing imperial revenue over rural welfare.

2. **Corruption and Nepotism**: Judicial posts like chief qazi suffered corruption; jagir assignments favored nobles over merit, causing inefficiencies.

3. **Limited Local Autonomy**: Centralization reduced local officials’ autonomy, alienating regional powers and disrupting socio-political balances.

4. **Fragmented Power**: The wakil became ceremonial; the diwan’s role was confined to revenue, causing administrative overlaps.

**Way Forward**

1. **Anti-Corruption Measures**: Strengthen oversight and transparent appointments in judiciary and revenue departments.

2. **Local Governance**: Incorporate local elites to balance central control with regional autonomy.

3. **Revenue Policy Revision**: Adjust land revenue to reflect local conditions, protecting peasants.

4. **Departmental Integration**: Improve coordination among departments to reduce overlaps and improve efficiency.

**Conclusion**

Akbar’s administration combined innovation with imperial ambition but revealed exploitative and administrative gaps, underscoring the need for just and efficient governance.

Critically evaluate the central administration under Akbar.

Model answer

Practise this question

The Mughals, the Marathas & the Advent of Europeans10 questions

Ghissu