2020 · Paper III · 10 marks

Define judicial activism with special reference to PIL and SAL. Judicial activism has had manifold impact on the political system. Justify the statement adding suitable arguments.

In short

Judicial activism is the courts' proactive role in protecting rights, expressed through PIL, which relaxes locus standi for the disadvantaged, and Social Action Litigation, Upendra Baxi's term for litigation serving the poor. Its impact includes greater accountability, as with candidate disclosure in the ADR case, alongside overreach and case backlogs.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Judicial activism, notably through Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and Social Action Litigation (SAL), has transformed India’s constitutional democracy by expanding access to justice and influencing political governance since the 1970s.
Judicial Activism Defined with Reference to PIL and SAL
•

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

PIL, pioneered by Justice P.N. Bhagwati, democratized justice access for marginalized groups, exemplified by the Bandhua Mukti Morcha case expanding Article 21 rights.

•

Social Action Litigation (SAL)

Upendra Baxi's term for Indian PIL aimed at the poor; courts relaxed locus standi, accepted letters as petitions (Sunil Batra) and at times acted suo motu.

•

Judicial Review and Activism Nexus

Judicial activism extends judicial review by shaping social policy, as in the Maneka Gandhi case broadening personal liberty.

Manifold Impact on the Political System
•

Enhancing Democratic Accountability

Judicial activism enforces transparency, seen in the Association for Democratic Reforms case mandating candidate disclosures.

•

Expanding Rights and Social Justice

The judiciary protects vulnerable groups and enforces socio-economic rights, including environmental rulings in Andhra Pradesh.

•

Blurring Separation of Powers

Judicial overreach raises Centre-State tensions, especially in water disputes involving Andhra Pradesh.

•

Judicial Overburden and Efficiency Issues

Increased PILs strain courts like the Andhra Pradesh High Court, affecting timely justice.

Arguments Justifying Judicial Activism
•

Filling Governance Voids

Judicial activism compensates for executive-legislative inertia, as in Vishaka guidelines on workplace harassment.

•

Promoting Transformative Constitutionalism

Courts interpret the Constitution as a living document advancing social change.

•

Safeguarding Marginalized Voices

PILs empower disadvantaged communities, vital for diverse states like Andhra Pradesh.

Conclusion
Judicial activism via PIL and SAL has expanded rights and accountability, reshaping India’s political system while posing challenges to institutional balance and judicial capacity.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: PIL and SAL. PIL and SAL. Comparison of PIL and SAL
Diagram: PIL and SAL

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Judiciary in India15 questions

Asked in 8 of 8 sittings since 2008

2008
2
2011
1
2012
3
2016
2
2017
1
2020
2
2023
2
2025
2

Most tested: Judicial review and its scope/limits

All 15 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official APPSC Group-I Mains 2020 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·