2023 · Paper III · 10 marks

Examine the scope of 'reasonable restrictions' and the 'test of reasonableness' in connection with Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.

In short

Article 19(2) to (6) allows only law to impose reasonable restrictions on the six freedoms for grounds like security, public order and morality, and courts test reasonableness through proportionality, proximate nexus and procedural fairness. In Shreya Singhal (2015), the Supreme Court struck down vague Section 66A.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
The scope of 'reasonable restrictions' under Article 19 involves balancing fundamental freedoms with public interest, shaped by judicial interpretations like Shreya Singhal v. UOI (2015), which stressed proportionality and clarity in restrictions.
Scope of 'Reasonable Restrictions' under Article 19
•

Constitutional Grounds for Restrictions

Articles 19(2) to (6) authorize restrictions on freedoms such as speech and assembly for sovereignty, security, public order, morality, and foreign relations; for instance, restrictions on speech prevent defamation or incitement.

•

Legislative Authority and Limits

Restrictions must be imposed by law and be reasonable, not arbitrary or excessive, as held in Chintaman Rao v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1950), ensuring a balance between individual rights and social control.

Judicial Analysis of the 'Test of Reasonableness'
•

Proportionality and Nexus Test

The Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal emphasized that restrictions must have a proximate nexus to the public interest, rejecting vague or broad laws like Section 66A of the IT Act.

•

Substantive and Procedural Reasonableness

Courts review both substance and procedure, as in Dr. N.B. Khare v. State of Delhi (1950), ensuring fairness in the duration and implementation of restrictions.

Constitutional and Judicial Framework Governing Restrictions
•

Judicial Review as Safeguard

The judiciary acts as a guardian of fundamental rights1 by scrutinizing restrictions to prevent arbitrary state action.

•

Integration with Article 21

The right to privacy under Article 21, recognized in the Puttaswamy judgment, also permits reasonable restrictions, complementing Article 19 protections.

Conclusion
The constitutional and judicial framework ensures that reasonable restrictions under Article 19 are proportionate, legally grounded, and protective of fundamental rights.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Test of reasonableness under Article 19. Test of reasonableness under Article 19. Flow: Restriction only by law → Ground in Articles 19(2)-(6) → Proximate nexus to public interest → Proportionate, not excessive → Fair procedure and duration → Valid restriction
Diagram: Test of reasonableness under Article 19

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Indian Constitution, Fundamental Rights, DPSP and Union-State functions18 questions

Asked in 8 of 8 sittings since 2008

2008
1
2011
4
2012
3
2016
4
2017
1
2020
2
2023
1
2025
2

Most tested: Rights, social justice, and constitutional safeguards for disadvantaged groups.

All 18 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official APPSC Group-I Mains 2023 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·