2024 · Paper IV · 10 marksFrequently asked

"Poverty reduction in different states of India has not been uniform during the post-economic reform period." Examine.

In short

Post-reform poverty reduction has been real but uneven, shaped by each state's economic structure, agricultural productivity, inequality and quality of governance. Multidimensional poverty fell from 29.17% to 11.28% between 2013-14 and 2022-23, with Telangana and Uttar Pradesh progressing faster while Bihar and Jharkhand lagged.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Post-1991 reforms, India’s poverty reduction has been uneven across states due to diverse socio-economic factors and policy responses. This disparity reflects differences in economic growth, governance, and social infrastructure, necessitating tailored strategies for inclusive development.
Patterns and Extent of Poverty Reduction
•

Overall Decline

India’s multidimensional poverty1 dropped from 29.17%2 (2013-14) to 11.28% (2022-23), lifting over 170 million people out of poverty; Uttar Pradesh saw the largest reduction of 5.94 crore people.

•

State Variations

Telangana’s 10.7%3 GSDP growth and Rs 4,18,931 per capita income in 2025-26 outpace national averages4, while Bihar lags with per capita income at 33% of the national average. Rural-urban divides also persist, with urban areas generally experiencing faster poverty reduction.

Causes of Non-Uniformity
•

Governance and Welfare

Telangana’s 12.4%5 welfare allocation for SC/ST/OBC and schemes like Rythu Bandhu demonstrate effective policy targeting aiding poverty reduction. Additionally, states with weak implementation and poor targeting have lagged behind.

Role of State Policies
•

Human Development

Telangana’s education (9.0%) and health (4.8%) spending supports capability building essential for sustainable poverty alleviation.

•

Labour Market

Telangana’s 60.7% labour force participation rate vs national 55.8% improves employment opportunities. Formalisation of jobs and urban infrastructure like Hyderabad’s HITEC City also contribute to poverty reduction.

Way Forward
•

Inclusive Growth

Skill development via the Skill India Digital Platform and schemes like the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) can create quality jobs, while expanding social protection schemes will ensure vulnerable groups benefit.

Conclusion
State-specific socio-economic conditions and targeted policies explain the uneven poverty reduction across India, highlighting the need for tailored, inclusive strategies to achieve equitable growth.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Why poverty fell unevenly. Why poverty fell unevenly. Diagram (fishbone): Why poverty fell unevenly; Uneven poverty reduction across states; Industry-services vs agrarian economies; Low farm yields, weak irrigation; Wealth and caste inequality; Uneven scheme targeting, delivery; Slower rural than urban gains
Diagram: Why poverty fell unevenly

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Poverty and unemployment4 questions

Asked in 2 of 2 sittings since 2016

2016
2
2024
2

Most tested: Anti-poverty programmes and poverty measurement/comparison

All 4 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official TGPSC Group-I Mains 2024 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·