2012 · Paper III

Discuss the administrative relations between the Union and the States. How are the Inter State Water Disputes resolved in India?

In short

Union-State administrative relations rest on Articles 256 and 257, which bind States to comply with Union laws, Article 258 delegation and the All India Services, while inter-state water disputes are settled under Article 262. The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 refers disputes to tribunals whose awards are binding.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Administrative relations between the Union and States underpin India’s federalism, especially in managing shared resources like interstate rivers, where disputes impact development and harmony.
Nature and Features of Administrative Relations
•

Federal Division of Powers

The Constitution assigns water powers to Union (Entry 56, List I) and States (Entry 17, List II), balancing state autonomy with Union regulation of interstate rivers.

•

Cooperative yet Conflictual Federalism

States control water use but often resist central intervention, complicating integrated river basin management, as seen in the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh and Krishna river disputes.

Constitutional and Institutional Framework
•

Article 262 and ISRWD Act

Article 262 empowers Parliament to exclude Supreme Court jurisdiction, leading to the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act (1956) which sets up tribunals with binding awards.

•

Permanent Tribunals and Mediation

The 2019 Amendment Bill proposed a permanent tribunal and a dispute resolution committee to expedite resolution, addressing delays like the 17-year Cauvery Tribunal process.

Effectiveness and Challenges
•

Delays and Enforcement Weakness

Tribunals face decades-long delays, data deficiencies, and enforcement depends on Union’s political will, weakening dispute resolution.

•

Mahanadi Tribunal’s Institutional Mediation

The Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal1 involving Odisha and Chhattisgarh, with central agencies like the Ministry of Jal Shakti, shows progress in cooperative dispute management.

Way Forward
•

Strengthen Basin Governance and Data

Integrated river basin authorities and transparent water data systems can reduce conflicts.

•

Empower Tribunals and Councils

Grant stronger enforcement powers and utilize Inter-State Councils for dialogue and consensus-building.

Conclusion
Balanced Union-State relations and robust institutional mechanisms are key to resolving interstate water disputes and sustaining cooperative federalism.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Resolving inter-state water disputes. Resolving inter-state water disputes. Flow: State seeks Union reference → Tribunal under ISRWD Act, 1956 → Binding award, courts excluded (Art 262) → Union enforces award → 2019: permanent tribunal, mediation
Diagram: Resolving inter-state water disputes

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Federal structure, Governor and distribution of powers17 questions

Asked in 8 of 8 sittings since 2008

2008
2
2011
2
2012
1
2016
3
2017
2
2020
2
2023
3
2025
2

Most tested: Centre–State balance and the extent of Union supremacy over States

All 17 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official APPSC Group-I Mains 2012 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·