2016 · Paper III · 10 marks

Comment briefly on the financial relations between the Union and the States in India. What are irritants generally encountered?

In short

Union-State financial relations rest on a constitutional division of taxes, Finance Commission devolution under Article 280 and central grants, with the GST Council pooling indirect taxes. States now get about 41% of central taxes, but vertical imbalance, shrinking grants, Centre-set Finance Commission terms and GST compensation remain irritants.

Model answer

Ghissu Editorial · Verified 4 Oct 2026

Introduction
Financial relations between the Union and States underpin India’s federalism, with states like Andhra Pradesh21 facing mounting debt and fiscal deficits post-bifurcation, highlighting persistent imbalances.
Framework of Financial Relations
•

Constitutional Tax Powers

The Seventh Schedule allocates Union taxes on income and customs, States tax local items like stamp duties and excise on alcohol, balancing revenue sources.

•

Finance Commission3 and Transfers

Article 280 mandates the Finance Commission to recommend tax devolution4 and grants; states’ share5 increased to about 41%. The Sixteenth Finance Commission continues this trend, but states contest ToR issues, including6 outdated population data affecting allocations.

•

Central Schemes and GST

States receive funds via Centrally Sponsored Schemes and Central Sector Schemes, with transfers projected at ₹26.21 lakh crore by 2026-27. The GST Council governs tax rates and compensation; however, Andhra Pradesh’s CAG audit revealed ₹1,806 crore revenue impact and major GST compliance gaps7.

Common Irritants
•

Delayed and Insufficient Grants

Central grants fell from ₹1.95 lakh crore in 2015-16 to ₹1.65 lakh crore in 2023-24, straining state finances.

•

GST Compensation and Compliance

Delays and disputes over GST compensation persist; Andhra Pradesh’s CFMS audit found ₹968 crore excess payments and 48% public account share, while Mines & Geology audits revealed revenue gaps.

Way Forward
•

Enhance State Tax Powers

Widen states' own revenue room through property and land-based taxes and a larger say within GST.

•

Finance Commission Reform

Update ToR with current data and include state representatives for equitable resource sharing.

Conclusion
Reforming fiscal federalism is essential to balance Union-State relations and ensure sustainable state finances.

This model answer is indicative and the model can make mistakes; please verify key facts independently.

Hand-drawn diagram: Irritants in Union-State finance. Irritants in Union-State finance. Diagram (fishbone): Irritants in Union-State finance; Fiscal friction; Vertical fiscal imbalance; Delayed, shrinking grants; Centre-set Terms of Reference; GST compensation disputes; Compliance gaps
Diagram: Irritants in Union-State finance

Practise this question

  1. 1Get the answer sheet

    Sized for this question.

  2. 2Write your answer

    Timed, by hand.

  3. 3Get it marked

    Your score and what to fix.

Share this questionWhatsAppTelegramXLinkedIn

This chapter in the exam

Federal structure, Governor and distribution of powers17 questions

Asked in 8 of 8 sittings since 2008

2008
2
2011
2
2012
1
2016
3
2017
2
2020
2
2023
3
2025
2

Most tested: Centre–State balance and the extent of Union supremacy over States

All 17 questions, sorted by sub-topic, with model answers and practice.

Question from the official APPSC Group-I Mains 2016 paper. Answer written by Ghissu's engine and checked against our editorial standards. Found an error? Tell us and we correct it within 48 hours.

Ghissu

OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·
OUTWORK·
OUTTHINK·
MASTER THE SYSTEM·